Cited by 8Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingCybercrime and Law Enforcement StudiesCrime, Deviance, and Social Control

Understanding and deterring online child grooming: A qualitative study

Open access
Wefers, Sarah, Dieseth, Therese, George, Emily, Øverland, Ida, Jolapara, Jayeta, McAree, Ciara, Findlater, Donald·2024·Sexual Offending: Theory, Research, and Prevention

Abstract

The prevalence of online child sexual grooming offenses has been on the rise, posing significant risks to children. Child sexual grooming involves sexual communication with minors. This study aims to understand motivations and pathways of individuals who have engaged in online grooming behaviour, as well as propose effective prevention and intervention strategies. A sample of 14 male participants who had engaged in online child grooming were interviewed. Five themes were identified through thematic analysis: Social aspects, Mental health and psychological aspects, Justification for offending, Secrecy and Technology. Within all five themes risk factors and protective factors relating to online grooming behaviour were identified. Three pathways into online grooming behaviour were hypothesised: social connection, addictive behaviour, and fantasy/roleplay. Additionally, the study highlights the complex relationship between online grooming and other child sexual abuse offences, including the sharing and distribution of indecent images of children. The study underscores the need for greater education and awareness about the risks and harms associated with online grooming for those at risk of engaging in this behaviour as well as wider support and situational prevention approaches, including monitoring and use of warning messages on relevant online platforms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5964/sotrap.13147

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adolescents who hold negative attitudes toward inappropriate online communication tend to take preventive measures more promptly, such as blocking perpetrators, avoiding contact, or seeking assistance from adults.

    “Wefers et al. (2024) found that adolescents who hold negative attitudes toward inappropriate online communication tend to take preventive measures more promptly, such as blocking perpetrators, avoiding contact, or seeking assistance from adults.”

    From Surfing Online Safety: Assertiveness and Parental Involvement in Adolescents’ Attitudes Toward Cyber Grooming (2025) · cites this paper as Wefers et al., 2024

    The Results (Overview of Results and Social Aspects; page not provided) discuss adults who engaged in online grooming and factors that might deter their offending. Searches for adolescents’ attitudes, blocking perpetrators, avoiding contact, and seeking adult help found no passage linking those attitudes to adolescents’ preventive actions or their timing. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Wefers S. Dieseth T. George E. Øverland I. Jolapara J. McAree C. Findlater D. (2024). Supplementary materials to "Understanding and deterring online child grooming: A qualitative study" [Online appendices]. PsychOpen. 10.23668/psycharchives.14139 PMC11778739 39886042 · DOI
  2. Prichard, J., Scanlan, J., Watters, P., Wortley, R., Hunn, C., & Garrett, E. (2022). Online messages to reduce users’ engagement with child sexual abuse material: A review of relevant literature for the rethink Chatbot. University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
  3. Taylor, H. (2017). Online sexual grooming: The role of offender motivation and grooming strategies [Doctoral thesis, University of Birmingham]. University of Birmingham eTheses Repository. https://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/eprint/7896/

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wefers, S., Dieseth, T., George, E., Øverland, I., Jolapara, J., McAree, C., & Findlater, D.
Affiliations
The Lucy Faithfull Foundation (GB)
Corresponding author
Wefers, Sarah
Venue
Sexual Offending: Theory, Research, and Prevention
Published
2024-02-15
Volume
19
Pages
e13147-e13147
ISSN
2699-8440 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391842979
Cited by
8
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 1
FWCI
4.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sexual Offending Theory Research and Prevention (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • PsychOpen Gold (Leibniz Institute for Psychology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Psychology Archives (cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime, Deviance, and Social Control
Keywords
online child grooming, child sexual abuse, criminal motivation, risk factors, protective factors, social connectedness, addictive behavior, secrecy, mental health, indecent images of children, prevention, male offenders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review