Learner and User Experience Research
Open accessAbstract
Researchers in the field of Learning/Instructional Design and Technology have been engaged in productive scholarly endeavors at the intersection of Learning Design, User Experience, Human-Computer Interaction, and associated disciplines for some time. This edited volume captures the collective voices of authors working in this area. This book focuses on explicating the ontological and epistemological underpinnings of user-centered design and user experience as applied in the field of Learning/Instructional Design and Technology with the goal of foregrounding the importance of learner experience as an emerging design paradigm for the field. This volume is comprised of 15 chapters and organized into three parts: (1) Methods and Paradigms (5 chapters), (2) Conceptual and Design Frameworks (6 chapters), and (3) LX Design-in-practice (4 chapters). This volume serves as a contribution to an emerging, transdisciplinary, and complex phenomenon that requires multiple literacies. LX is not only concerned with the effectiveness of designed learning interventions, but also with the interconnected and interdependent relationship between the learner- (or the teacher-/instructor-) as-user, the designed technology, novel pedagogical techniques or instructional strategies, and the learning context. The diversity and breadth of perspectives presented herein serve as a topographical sketch of the emerging focus area of learner experience and represent an opportunity to build upon this work in t…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cited by
Sorted by citations
McCoy, L., Ganesan, N., Rajagopalan, V., McKell, D., Niño, D. F., & Swaim, M. C. (2025) · Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development · doi:10.1177/23821205251339226 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Trust-Building in Peer-to-Peer Carsharing: Design Case Study for Algorithm-Based Reputation Systems
Neifer, T., Bossauer, P., Pakusch, C., Boehm, L., & Lawo, D. (2024) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1007/s10606-022-09461-4 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Schmidt, M., Tawfik, A., Jahnke, I., & Earnshaw, Y.
- Affiliations
- University of Georgia (US)
- University of Memphis (US)
- University of Technology Nuremberg (DE)
- Kennesaw State University (US)
- Publisher
- EdTech Books
- Published
- 2020
- DOI
- 10.59668/36
- OpenAlex
- W2970853990
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 6
- FWCI
- 7.11
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Keywords
- student experience, user experience, user-centered design, learning design, instructional design and technology, human-computer interaction, teaching methods, learning context, design paradigms, design framework
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review