Cited by 0Immunotherapy and Immune Responsesvaccines and immunoinformatics approachesImmune responses and vaccinations

Engineering intramolecular adjuvants for next-generation vaccines

Open access
Wang, Yetong, Liao, Weinian, Zhang, Zhiling, Wang, Tianyue, Zhang, Jun, Zai, Xiaodong, Xu, Junjie·2026·The Innovation Medicine

Abstract

Vaccines play a pivotal role in reducing the global burden of infectious diseases. Currently, vaccine development is transitioning from empirical approaches toward precision engineering. The intramolecular adjuvant strategy, which fuses adjuvants and antigens into single molecules via genetic engineering, emerges as a promising strategy with the potential to play a key role in this transition. Through precise control of co-delivery and synergistic signaling, intramolecular adjuvants can modulate the magnitude, duration, and type of immune response, thereby advancing vaccine design toward a more programmable paradigm, in which immune activation can be rationally tuned at the molecular level, ultimately enabling “programmable immunity”. This review systematically summarizes the current toolbox of genetically encoded intramolecular adjuvants, including derivatives of bacterial toxins, pattern recognition receptor (PRR) ligands, cytokines, and the complement fragments. By integrating structural biology, synthetic biology, and immunology, we delineate their mechanisms in receptor-targeted delivery and synergistic immune pathway activation. Notably, artificial intelligence (AI) might accelerate the rational development of intramolecular adjuvants via sequence mining, structural optimization and de novo design. Collectively, this review aims to establish a systematic framework for intramolecular adjuvant selection and design, advancing a data-driven paradigm to counter emerging pathogens.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.59717/j.xinn-med.2026.100258

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Wang, Y., Liao, W., Zhang, Z., Wang, T., Zhang, J., Zai, X., & Xu, J.
Affiliations
Academy of Military Medical Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Zai, Xiaodong
  • Xu, Junjie
Venue
The Innovation Medicine
Published
2026
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
100258
ISSN
2959-8745 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7213779565
Cited by
0
References
3
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
The Innovation Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune responses and vaccinations
Keywords
vaccine design, bacterial toxins, cytokines, complement fragments, synthetic biology, structural biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review