Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 0

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Literatur Review : Implementasi Manajemen Mutu Dan Kualitas Layanan Di Unit Laboratorium

Modestus La'a, Vip Paramarta, Marianne Lukytha Tangdililing·2023·Journal Innovation In Education

Abstract

This comprehensive review synthesizes findings from various journals on the management of quality and service in laboratory units within the healthcare context. The synthesis reveals the importance of service quality and its impact on patient satisfaction and service effectiveness. Key findings include the positive influence of service quality dimensions such as reliability, physical evidence, and friendliness on patient satisfaction. Additionally, the interconnection between service quality and adherence to health standards and regulations is emphasized, underlining the significance of compliance for service improvement. External factors, such as government regulations and health policies, are identified as potential influencers of service quality, adding complexity to quality management. Practical implications for healthcare policies and practices are highlighted, suggesting improvements in human resource training, service processes, and infrastructure. Recommendations include strengthening human resource training through regular and ongoing programs, optimizing service processes by thorough workflow evaluations, and ensuring strict compliance with health standards. Furthermore, the integration of technological innovations is proposed as a progressive step toward enhancing service efficiency and result accuracy. The implementation of laboratory information systems, modern equipment, and related applications is suggested to advance service quality. The establishment of a regular monitoring and evaluation system, including internal audits, routine performance reviews, and patient feedback collection, is crucial for continuous improvement. Collaboration with external entities, such as health oversight agencies and laboratory professional associations, is advocated for robust guidance and support. Encouraging research and innovation in quality management and laboratory service is recommended to enhance understanding of new technology applications, quality maintenance strategies, and policy impact evaluation. By implementing these suggestions, laboratory units are expected to continually enhance service quality and ensure optimal patient satisfaction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.59841/inoved.v1i4.626

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Metadata

Authors
La'a, M., Paramarta, V., & Tangdililing, M. L.
Venue
Journal Innovation In Education
Published
2023-11-16
Volume
1
Issue
4
Pages
130-146
ISSN
3021-7474
Cited by
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Literatur Review : Implementasi Manajemen Mutu Dan Kualitas Layanan Di Unit Laboratorium. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.59841/inoved.v1i4.626
The paper
La'a, M., Paramarta, V., & Tangdililing, M. L. (2023). Literatur Review : Implementasi Manajemen Mutu Dan Kualitas Layanan Di Unit Laboratorium. Journal Innovation In Education. https://doi.org/10.59841/inoved.v1i4.626

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.