Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 634

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

NCCN Task Force Report: Management of Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST)—Update of the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines

Demetri, George D., Benjamin, Robert S., Blanke, Charles D., Blay, Jean-Yves, Casali, Paolo, Choi, Haesun, Corless, Christopher L., Debiec-Rychter, Maria, DeMatteo, Ronald P., Ettinger, David S., Fisher, George A., Fletcher, Christopher D. M., Gronchi, Alessandro, Hohenberger, Peter, Hughes, Miranda, Joensuu, Heikki, Judson, Ian, Le Cesne, Axel, Maki, Robert G., Morse, Michael, Pappo, Alberto S., Pisters, Peter W. T., Raut, Chandrajit P., Reichardt, Peter, Tyler, Douglas S., Van den Abbeele, Annick D., von Mehren, Margaret, Wayne, Jeffrey D., Zalcberg, John·2007·Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network

Abstract

The NCCN Soft Tissue Sarcoma Guidelines include a subsection about treatment recommendations for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). The standard of practice rapidly changed after the introduction of effective molecularly targeted therapy (such as imatinib and sunitinib) for GIST. Because of these changes, NCCN organized a multidisciplinary panel composed of experts in the fields of medical oncology, molecular diagnostics, pathology, radiation oncology, and surgery to discuss the optimal approach for the care of patients with GIST at all stages of the disease. The GIST Task Force is composed of NCCN faculty and other key experts from the United States, Europe, and Australia. The Task Force met for the first time in October 2003 and again in December 2006 with the purpose of expanding on the existing NCCN guidelines for gastrointestinal sarcomas and identifying areas of future research to optimize our understanding and treatment of GIST. (JNCCN 2007;5[Suppl 2]:S1–S29)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.6004/jnccn.2007.2002

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 634

Metadata

Authors
Demetri, G. D., Benjamin, R. S., Blanke, C. D., Blay, J.-Y., Casali, P., Choi, H., Corless, C. L., Debiec-Rychter, M., DeMatteo, R. P., Ettinger, D. S., Fisher, G. A., Fletcher, C. D. M., Gronchi, A., Hohenberger, P., Hughes, M., Joensuu, H., Judson, I., Le Cesne, A., Maki, R. G., Morse, M., Pappo, A. S., Pisters, P. W. T., Raut, C. P., Reichardt, P., Tyler, D. S., Van den Abbeele, A. D., von Mehren, M., Wayne, J. D., & Zalcberg, J.
Venue
Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
Published
2007-05
Volume
5
Issue
S2
Pages
S-1-S-29
ISSN
  • 1540-1405 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-1413
OpenAlex
W110525943
Cited by
634
References
2
FWCI
46.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: NCCN Task Force Report: Management of Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST)—Update of the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.6004/jnccn.2007.2002
The paper
Demetri, G. D., Benjamin, R. S., Blanke, C. D., Blay, J.-Y., Casali, P., Choi, H., Corless, C. L., Debiec-Rychter, M., DeMatteo, R. P., Ettinger, D. S., Fisher, G. A., Fletcher, C. D. M., Gronchi, A., Hohenberger, P., Hughes, M., Joensuu, H., Judson, I., Le Cesne, A., Maki, R. G., . . . Zalcberg, J. (2007). NCCN Task Force Report: Management of Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST)—Update of the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2007.2002

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.