Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 484

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

NCCN Guidelines Insights: Rectal Cancer, Version 6.2020: Featured Updates to the NCCN Guidelines

Open access
Benson, Al B., Venook, Alan P., Al-Hawary, Mahmoud M., Arain, Mustafa A., Chen, Yi-Jen, Ciombor, Kristen K., Cohen, Stacey, Cooper, Harry S., Deming, Dustin, Garrido-Laguna, Ignacio, Grem, Jean L., Gunn, Andrew, Hoffe, Sarah, Hubbard, Joleen, Hunt, Steven, Kirilcuk, Natalie, Krishnamurthi, Smitha, Messersmith, Wells A., Meyerhardt, Jeffrey, Miller, Eric D., Mulcahy, Mary F., Nurkin, Steven, Overman, Michael J., Parikh, Aparna, Patel, Hitendra, Pedersen, Katrina, Saltz, Leonard, Schneider, Charles, Shibata, David, Skibber, John M., Sofocleous, Constantinos T., Stoffel, Elena M., Stotsky-Himelfarb, Eden, Willett, Christopher G., Johnson-Chilla, Alyse, Gurski, Lisa A.·2020·Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network

Abstract

The NCCN Guidelines for Rectal Cancer provide recommendations for the diagnosis, evaluation, treatment, and follow-up of patients with rectal cancer. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel discussion behind recent important updates to the guidelines. These updates include clarifying the definition of rectum and differentiating the rectum from the sigmoid colon; the total neoadjuvant therapy approach for localized rectal cancer; and biomarker-targeted therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer, with a focus on new treatment options for patients with BRAF V600E– or HER2 amplification–positive disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.6004/jnccn.2020.0032

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 38 references

Cited by

See all 484

Metadata

Authors
Benson, A. B., Venook, A. P., Al-Hawary, M. M., Arain, M. A., Chen, Y.-J., Ciombor, K. K., Cohen, S., Cooper, H. S., Deming, D., Garrido-Laguna, I., Grem, J. L., Gunn, A., Hoffe, S., Hubbard, J., Hunt, S., Kirilcuk, N., Krishnamurthi, S., Messersmith, W. A., Meyerhardt, J., Miller, E. D., Mulcahy, M. F., Nurkin, S., Overman, M. J., Parikh, A., Patel, H., Pedersen, K., Saltz, L., Schneider, C., Shibata, D., Skibber, J. M., Sofocleous, C. T., Stoffel, E. M., Stotsky-Himelfarb, E., Willett, C. G., Johnson-Chilla, A., & Gurski, L. A.
Venue
Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
Published
2020-07
Volume
18
Issue
7
Pages
806-815
ISSN
  • 1540-1405 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-1413
OpenAlex
W3039450521
Cited by
484
References
38
FWCI
28.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: NCCN Guidelines Insights: Rectal Cancer, Version 6.2020: Featured Updates to the NCCN Guidelines. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.6004/jnccn.2020.0032
The paper
Benson, A. B., Venook, A. P., Al-Hawary, M. M., Arain, M. A., Chen, Y.-J., Ciombor, K. K., Cohen, S., Cooper, H. S., Deming, D., Garrido-Laguna, I., Grem, J. L., Gunn, A., Hoffe, S., Hubbard, J., Hunt, S., Kirilcuk, N., Krishnamurthi, S., Messersmith, W. A., Meyerhardt, J., . . . Gurski, L. A. (2020). NCCN Guidelines Insights: Rectal Cancer, Version 6.2020: Featured Updates to the NCCN Guidelines. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2020.0032

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.