The DOI matches its Crossref record.
From Scanning to Sexting: The Scope of Protection of Dignity-Based Privacy in Canadian Child Pornography Law
Open accessAbstract
The Canadian approach to privacy rights in one's body is embedded in the relationship between interests in privacy, bodily integrity, and human dignity. Clarifying these interests is complicated by Canada's middle-ground stance between the European "dignity-based" approach to privacy and the US "liberty-based" orientation. The Canadian approach is closer to the European model when intrusions upon the body are conceived as wholly or mostly non-consensual (e.g., strip searches, voyeurism, and most child pornography). However, once consent plays a potentially determinative rote, the US liberty-based approach gains ground. This reluctance to fully align dignity with privacy results in confusion about the scope of ongoing privacy interests in nude images, as evidenced by recent debates about the use of airport body scanners and the appropriate response to adolescent "sexting." The author argues that a clearer alignment with a dignity-based approach emerging in Canadian child pornography jurisprudence would better address the harms caused by misuse of photography, as applicable to both children and adults.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“More recently, researchers have pushed to separate definitions of sexting according to degrees of consent (Slane, 2010; Slane, 2013; Krieger, 2017).”
From Young people's experiences of image-based sexual harassment and abuse in England and Canada: Toward a feminist framing of technologically facilitated sexual violence (2022) · cites this paper as Slane, 2010
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ringrose, J., Milne, B., Mishna, F., Regehr, K., & Slane, A. (2022) · Women's Studies International Forum · doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2022.102615 · Cited by 67
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Slane, A.
- Affiliations
- Ontario Tech University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Slane, Andrea
- ORCID
- Slane, Andrea
- Venue
- Osgoode Hall Law Journal
- Published
- 2010-07-01
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 543-593
- ISSN
- 0030-6185 (ISSN-L)
- 2817-5069
- OpenAlex
- W81197506
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Osgoode Hall law journal (publishedVersion)
- eYLS (Yale Law School) (submittedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Law, Rights, and Freedoms
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Law and Evidence
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal Rights and Human Rights
- Keywords
- child pornography law, right to privacy, bodily integrity, human dignity, nude images, sexting, voyeurism, strip searches, comparative privacy law
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review