Cited by 21Ethics and Social Impacts of AIExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)AI and HR Technologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Examining Ethical Aspects of AI: Addressing Bias and Equity in the Discipline

Open access
Shuford, Jeff·2024·Journal of Artificial Intelligence General science (JAIGS) ISSN:3006-4023

Abstract

he rapid progress in implementing Artificial Intelligence (AI) across various domains such as healthcare decision-making, medical diagnosis, and others has raised significant concerns regarding the fairness and bias embedded within AI systems. This is particularly crucial in sectors like healthcare, employment, criminal justice, credit scoring, and the emerging field of generative AI models (GenAI) producing synthetic media. Such systems can lead to unfair outcomes and perpetuate existing inequalities, including biases ingrained in the synthetic data representation of individuals.This survey paper provides a concise yet comprehensive examination of fairness and bias in AI, encompassing their origins, ramifications, and potential mitigation strategies. We scrutinize sources of bias, including data, algorithmic, and human decision biases, shedding light on the emergent issue of generative AI bias where models may replicate and amplify societal stereotypes. Assessing the societal impact of biased AI systems, we spotlight the perpetuation of inequalities and the reinforcement of harmful stereotypes, especially as generative AI gains traction in shaping public perception through generated content.Various proposed mitigation strategies are explored, with an emphasis on the ethical considerations surrounding their implementation. We stress the necessity of interdisciplinary collaboration to ensure the effectiveness of these strategies. Through a systematic literature review spanning multiple academic disciplines, we define AI bias and its various types, delving into the nuances of generative AI bias. We discuss the adverse effects of AI bias on individuals and society, providing an overview of current approaches to mitigate bias, including data preprocessing, model selection, and post-processing. Unique challenges posed by generative AI models are highlighted, underscoring the importance of tailored strategies to address them effectively.Addressing bias in AI necessitates a holistic approach, involving diverse and representative datasets, enhanced transparency, and accountability in AI systems, and exploration of alternative AI paradigms prioritizing fairness and ethical considerations. This survey contributes to the ongoing discourse on developing fair and unbiased AI systems by outlining the sources, impacts, and mitigation strategies related to AI bias, with a particular focus on the burgeoning field of generative AI.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.60087/jaigs.v3i1.119

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Metadata

Authors
Shuford, J.
Corresponding author
Shuford, Jeff
Venue
Journal of Artificial Intelligence General science (JAIGS) ISSN:3006-4023
Published
2024-04-07
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
262-280
ISSN
3006-4023 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4396775138
Cited by
21
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 1
FWCI
8.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Artificial Intelligence General science (JAIGS) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
Keywords
algorithmic bias, algorithmic fairness, generative AI bias, bias mitigation, data bias, social stereotypes, synthetic media, artificial intelligence in healthcare, algorithmic discrimination, equity, transparency and accountability, post-processing, model selection, data preprocessing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review