Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 966

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Notes on the use of propagation of error formulas

Open access
Ku, H.H.·1966·Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards, Section C: Engineering and Instrumentation

Abstract

Th e " la w of propagation o[ error" is a tool th a t physical sc ienti s ts have co nve nie ntly and fre qu en tly used in th e ir work for ma n y years, yet an adeq uate refere nce is diffi c u lt to find.In thi s paper an expository rev ie w of thi s topi c is prese nte d , partic ularly in the li ght of c urre nt prac ti ces a nd interpretation s.Examp les on t he acc uracy of th e approximations are give n.The reportin g of th e un ce rtainti es of final res ults is di sc ussed .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.6028/jres.070c.025

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 966

Metadata

Authors
Ku, H. H.
Venue
Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards, Section C: Engineering and Instrumentation
Published
1966-10
Volume
70C
Issue
4
Pages
263
ISSN
0022-4316 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2326325773
Cited by
966
References
0
FWCI
5.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Notes on the use of propagation of error formulas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.6028/jres.070c.025
The paper
Ku, H. H. (1966). Notes on the use of propagation of error formulas. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards, Section C: Engineering and Instrumentation. https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.070c.025

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.