The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 15 are not checked yet.
Module-lattice-based key-encapsulation mechanism standard
Open accessAbstract
A key-encapsulation mechanism (KEM) is a set of algorithms that, under certain conditions, can be used by two parties to establish a shared secret key over a public channel. A shared secret key that is securely established using a KEM can then be used with symmetric-key cryptographic algorithms to perform basic tasks in secure communications, such as encryption and authentication. This standard specifies a key-encapsulation mechanism called ML-KEM. The security of ML-KEM is related to the computational difficulty of the Module Learning with Errors problem. At present,ML-KEM is believed to be secure, even against adversaries who possess a quantum computer. This standard specifies three parameter sets for ML-KEM. In order of increasing security strength and decreasing performance, these are ML-KEM-512, ML-KEM-768, and ML-KEM-1024.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The security of ML-KEM is based primarily on the presumed hardness of certain computational problems in lattices.”
From Status report on the fourth round of the NIST post-quantum cryptography standardization process (2025) · cites this paper as [14]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In the third round of the PQC Standardization Process, NIST selected one KEM -Kyber -that was then standardized as ML-KEM in FIPS 203 [14].”
From Status report on the fourth round of the NIST post-quantum cryptography standardization process (2025) · cites this paper as [14]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“NIST finalized three post-quantum cryptography (PQC) standards in August 2024: FIPS 203 (ML-KEM, a lattice-based key encapsulation mechanism), FIPS 204 (ML-DSA, a latticebased digital signature algorithm), and FIPS 205 (SLH-DSA, a stateless hash-based signature standard).[36], [37], [38]”
From Zero Trust Architecture for Smart Factories: Securing Digital Twins and Cyber-Physical OT Systems (2026) · cites this paper as [36]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Chen L (2022) Recommendation for key derivation using pseudorandom functions, (National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD), NIST Special Publication (SP) 800-108r1-upd1, Includes updates as of February 2, 2024. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP. 800-108r1-upd1. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Transition to Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards
Regenscheid, A. (2024) · doi:10.6028/nist.ir.8547 · Cited by 173
Status report on the fourth round of the NIST post-quantum cryptography standardization process
Alagic, G., Bros, M., Ciadoux, P., Cooper, D., Dang, Q., Dang, T., Kelsey, J., Lichtinger, J., Liu, Y.-K., Miller, C., et al. (2025) · doi:10.6028/nist.ir.8545 · Cited by 211
Security Guidelines for Implementing Homomorphic Encryption
Bossuat, J.-P., Cammarota, R., Chillotti, I., Curtis, B. R., Dai, W., Gong, H., Hales, E., Kim, D., Kumara, B., Lee, C., et al. (2025) · IACR Communications in Cryptology · doi:10.62056/anxra69p1 · Cited by 63
Anonymous, Zalcman, A., Gidney, C., Broughton, M., Khattar, T., Neven, H., Bergamaschi, T., Drake, J., & Boneh, D. (2026) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/j3xf-bw18 · Cited by 58
Toward 6G Authentication and Key Agreement Protocol: A Survey on Hybrid Post Quantum Cryptography
Turnip, T. N., Andersen, B., & Vargas‐Rosales, C. (2025) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2025.3567439 · Cited by 51
Aquina, N., Cimoli, B., Das, S., Hövelmanns, K., Weber, F. J., Okonkwo, C. M., Rommel, S., Škorić, B., Monroy, I. T., & Verschoor, S. R. (2025) · EPJ Quantum Technology · doi:10.1140/epjqt/s40507-025-00350-5 · Cited by 49
A performance evaluation framework for post-quantum TLS
Montenegro, J. A., Rı́os, R., & López-Cerezo, J. (2025) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2025.108062 · Cited by 46
Quantum cryptography beyond key distribution: Theory and experiment
Bozzio, M., Crépeau, C., Wallden, P., & Walther, P. (2025) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/p84v-1xqv · Cited by 35
Hybrid Key Exchange in TLS 1.3
Stebila, D., Fluhrer, S. R., & Gueron, S. (2026) · doi:10.17487/rfc9954 · Cited by 30
Transitioning the Use of Cryptographic Algorithms and Key Lengths
Barker, E. B. (2024) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-131ar3.ipd · Cited by 29
Considerations for Achieving Crypto Agility: Strategies and Practices
Barker, E., Chen, L., Regenscheid, A., Moody, D., Newhouse, W., Kent, K., Barker, W., Cooper, D., Souppaya, M., Housley, R., et al. (2025) · doi:10.6028/nist.cswp.39 · Cited by 28
RetractedRecommendations for key-encapsulation mechanisms
Alagic, G., Barker, E., Chen, L., Moody, D., Robinson, A., Silberg, H., & Waller, N. (2025) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-227 · Cited by 27
Next-Generation Security in the 6G Era: The Role of AI in Safeguarding Future Networks
Kumar, R., Dutta, J., Vamsi, M., Varri, U. S., & Puthal, D. (2026) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3650208 · Cited by 24
ParallelNTT: Maximizing Performance of Forward and Inverse NTT on FPGA for ML-DSA and ML-KEM
Taghavi, B., Azarderakhsh, R., & Kermani, M. M. (2025) · ACM Great Lakes Symposium on VLSI (GLSVLSI) · doi:10.1145/3716368.3735214 · Cited by 22
Considerations for Achieving Crypto Agility:
Barker, E. B. (2026) · doi:10.6028/nist.cswp.39-upd1 · Cited by 19
NIST First Call for Multi-Party Threshold Schemes
Brandão, L. T. A. N., & Peralta, R. (2025) · doi:10.6028/nist.ir.8214c.2pd · Cited by 18
Chen, S.-J., & Tsai, Y. (2025) · Computing&AI сonnect. · doi:10.69709/caic.2025.102135 · Cited by 17
Versatile quantum-safe hybrid key exchange and its application to MACsec
Buruaga, J. S., Bugler, A., Brito, J. P., Martín, V., & Striecks, C. (2025) · EPJ Quantum Technology · doi:10.1140/epjqt/s40507-025-00382-x · Cited by 16
A Review of Distributed Ledger Technologies for Satellite Operations
Probert, B., Clark, R., Blasch, E., & Macdonald, M. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3588688 · Cited by 16
Bizri, M. E., El‐Hajj, A. M., Sliman, L., & Haidar, A. M. (2026) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3650465 · Cited by 16
Olushola, A., & Meenakshi, S. P. (2026) · Frontiers in Physics · doi:10.3389/fphy.2025.1723966 · Cited by 15
Single trace HQC shared key recovery with SASCA
Goy, G., Maillard, J., Gaborit, P., & Loiseau, A. (2024) · IACR Transactions on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems · doi:10.46586/tches.v2024.i2.64-87 · Cited by 15
PQBFL: A Post-Quantum Blockchain-based protocol for Federated Learning
Gharavi, H., Granjal, J., & Monteiro, E. (2025) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2025.111472 · Cited by 15
Hybrid Quantum-Safe Cryptographic Scheme With Secure Key Exchange and Signature Scheme
Maduni, P. K., Byun, I., Seo, J., & Ko, K. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3600068 · Cited by 13
Zhu, D., & Guan, Y. (2025) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2025.3623886 · Cited by 13
An Area-Time Efficient Hardware Architecture for ML-KEM Post-Quantum Cryptography Standard
Nguyen, T.-H., Dang, T.-K., Dam, D.-T., Nguyen, K.-D., Duong, P.-P., Pham, C., & Hoang, T.-T. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3579379 · Cited by 13
Energy Consumption Framework and Analysis of Post-Quantum Key-Generation on Embedded Devices
Patterson, J. C., Buchanan, W. J., & Turino, C. (2025) · Journal of Cybersecurity and Privacy · doi:10.3390/jcp5030042 · Cited by 12
Foundational Cybersecurity Activities for IoT Product Manufacturers
Fagan, M. J. (2025) · doi:10.6028/nist.ir.8259r1 · Cited by 12
Cyber Security and Data Ownership
Vrana, J. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-48200-8_79-1 · Cited by 10
Günther, F., Stebila, D., & Veitch, S. (2024) · ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS) · doi:10.1145/3658644.3690220 · Cited by 9
Security Analysis of Signal’s $$\textsf{PQXDH} $$ Handshake
Fiedler, R., & Günther, F. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-91823-0_5 · Cited by 9
FrodoKEM: A CCA-Secure Learning With Errors Key Encapsulation Mechanism
Glabush, L., Longa, P., Naehrig, M., Peikert, C., Stebila, D., & Virdia, F. (2025) · IACR Communications in Cryptology · doi:10.62056/ayivom2hd · Cited by 9
Considerations for Achieving Cryptographic Agility:
Barker, E., Chen, L., Cooper, D., Moody, D., Regenscheid, A., Souppaya, M., Newhouse, B., Housley, R., Turner, S., Barker, W., et al. (2025) · doi:10.6028/nist.cswp.39.2pd · Cited by 9
RetractedA Toolchain for Assisting Migration of Software Executables Towards Post-Quantum Cryptography
Rattanavipanon, N., Suaboot, J., & Werapun, W. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3524309 · Cited by 8
Kyber-KEM-Ascon: Benchmarking a Lightweight Post-quantum KEM on IoT Devices
Shehzadi, S., Whaley, N., Khalid, A., Ghafoor, A., Arshad, S., Islam, F. U., & O'Neill, M. P. (2025) · IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems proceedings · doi:10.1109/iscas56072.2025.11043792 · Cited by 8
Compact FALCON FFT/NTT Accelerator for Post-Quantum Cryptography
Dam, D.-T., Tran, T.-H., Nguyen, T.-H., Hoang, T.-T., & Pham, C. (2025) · IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems proceedings · doi:10.1109/iscas56072.2025.11043460 · Cited by 8
Enabling Microarchitectural Agility: Taking ML-KEM & ML-DSA from Cortex-M4 to M7 with SLOTHY
Abdulrahman, A., Kannwischer, M. J., & Lim, T.-H. (2025) · ACM Asia Conference on Computer and Communications Security (ASIA CCS) · doi:10.1145/3708821.3736210 · Cited by 8
Wang, Y., Yu, J., Qu, S., Zhang, X., Li, X., Zhang, C., & Gu, D. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2025.3607242 · Cited by 8
Post-quantum cryptography for intelligent transportation systems: An implementation-focused review
Mamun, M. A. A., Abrar, A., Rahman, M., Salek, M. S., & Chowdhury, M. A. (2026) · Vehicular Communications · doi:10.1016/j.vehcom.2026.101028 · Cited by 8
Unveiling Samsung Quantum Galaxy: Securing Smartphones With Quantum and Post-Quantum Cryptography
Alibrahim, O. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3563826 · Cited by 8
Recommendations for Key-Encapsulation Mechanisms
Alagic, G. (2023) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-227.ipd · Cited by 8
RetractedEnhancing Transportation Cyber-Physical Systems Security: A Shift to Post-Quantum CryptographyPreprint
Mamun, A. A., Abrar, A., Rahman, M., Salek, M. S., & Chowdhury, M. A. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.13023 · Cited by 8
Evaluating Post-Quantum Cryptographic Algorithms on Resource-Constrained DevicesPreprint
Lopez, J., Cadena, V., & Rahman, M. S. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.08312 · Cited by 8
Blockchain in the Quantum Era: Surveying Security Challenges and Post-Quantum Cryptography
Ramzan, M. T., & Cimato, S. (2025) · IEEE Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC) · doi:10.1109/compsac65507.2025.00311 · Cited by 7
Gemeda, K. A., Hailu, S., Tseghai, A., Haile, G., Tamirat, B., Bitew, W., Abebe, M., Kemal, A., Silassie, S. W., Regassa, D., et al. (2026) · Discover Internet of Things · doi:10.1007/s43926-025-00275-6 · Cited by 7
Lattice-Based Post-Quantum Cryptography for Homomorphic Encryption
Chen, A. C. H. (2025) · International Conference on Smart Systems for Applications in Electrical Sciences (ICSSES) · doi:10.1109/icsses64899.2025.11009905 · Cited by 7
On the Practical Feasibility of Harvest-Now, Decrypt-Later AttacksPreprint
Blanco-Romero, J., Mendoza, F. A., Rubio, C. G., Campo, C., & Sánchez, D. D. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.01091 · Cited by 7
Efficient access authentication for quantum communication network with digital certificates
Wang, M., Guo, J., Zhang, W., & Long, G. (2025) · Fundamental Research · doi:10.1016/j.fmre.2025.10.014 · Cited by 6
Energy Consumption Benchmarking of Post-Quantum Cryptography on Resource-Constrained IoT Nodes
Holgado-Moreno, A., Portilla, J., López-Fernández, D., & Redondo, L. (2026) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2026.3663839 · Cited by 6
Hybrid ML-KEM in TLS 1.3: Performance Analysis on ARM64 Under Network Stress
İnce, C. (2026) · Computer Science · doi:10.53070/bbd.1898820 · Cited by 6
hax: Verifying Security-Critical Rust Software Using Multiple Provers
Bhargavan, K., Buyse, M., Franceschino, L., Hansen, L. L., Kiefer, F., Schneider-Bensch, J., & Spitters, B. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-86695-1_7 · Cited by 6
Tailorable codes for lattice-based KEMs with applications to compact ML-KEM instantiations
Paiva, T. B., Junior, M. A. S., Hafiz, S. M., Yıldız, B., Cominetti, E. L., & Ogawa, H. S. (2025) · IACR Transactions on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems · doi:10.46586/tches.v2025.i3.139-163 · Cited by 6
Hybrid Quantum Security for IPsecPreprint
Blanco-Romero, J., García, P. O., Sobral-Blanco, D., Mendoza, F. A., Vilas, A. F., & Fernández‐Veiga, M. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.09288 · Cited by 6
Gómez-Cambronero, D., Munteanu, D., & González-Tablas, A. I. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.11006 · Cited by 6
KEM-22: An Efficient Post-Quantum ML-KEM Hardware Accelerator on 22-nm ASIC
Matteo, S. D., Sarno, I., Valea, E., & Saponara, S. (2025) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2025.3635477 · Cited by 5
Raja, G., Theerthagiri, S., Raja, K., Ramanujam, J. A., Sadhasivam, T., Vasudevan, P., Paventhan, A., Khowaja, S. A., & Dev, K. (2025) · IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society · doi:10.1109/ojcoms.2025.3643607 · Cited by 5
Ghaleb, B., Ahmad, J. E., Al‐Dubai, A., Khan, M. K., Latif, S., & Khan, M. S. (2026) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2026.3691266 · Cited by 5
On the Energy Cost of Post-Quantum Key Establishment in Wireless Low-Power Personal Area Networks
Liu, T., Ramachandran, G. S., & Jurdak, R. (2026) · doi:10.1145/3774906.3802784 · Cited by 5
Post-Quantum Security: Origin, Fundamentals, and Adoption
Barzen, J., & Leymann, F. (2024) · Trends in Computer Science and Information Technology · doi:10.17352/tcsit.000089 · Cited by 5
Weight equalization algorithm for tree parity machines
Stypiński, M., & Niemiec, M. (2024) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2024.110988 · Cited by 5
MAYO Key Recovery by Fixing Vinegar Seeds
Jendral, S., & Dubrova, E. (2025) · IACR Communications in Cryptology · doi:10.62056/ab0ljbkrz · Cited by 5
Downtime Required for Bitcoin Quantum-SafetyPreprint
Pont, J., Kearney, J. J., Moyler, J., & Pérez-Delgado, C. A. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.16965 · Cited by 5
Considerations for Achieving Cryptographic Agility:
Barker, E., Chen, L., Cooper, D., Moody, D., Regenscheid, A., Souppaya, M., Newhouse, B., Housley, R., & Turner, S. (2024) · doi:10.6028/nist.cswp.39.ipd · Cited by 5
RetractedPost-Quantum Cryptography in OpenPGP
Kousidis, S., Roth, J., Strenzke, F., & Wussler, A. (2026) · doi:10.17487/rfc9980 · Cited by 5
Quantum Authenticated Key Expansion with Key Recycling
Kon, W. Y., Chu, J., Loh, K. H. Y., Alia, O., Amer, O., Pistoia, M., Chakraborty, K., & Lim, C. C. W. (2026) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2026-10-28-2255 · Cited by 4
Average Hardness of SIVP for Module Lattices of Fixed Rank
de Boer, K., Page, A., Toma, R., & Wesolowski, B. (2026) · ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC) · doi:10.1145/3798129.3800796 · Cited by 4
Zamil, A. K., & Jasim, A. D. (2025) · Mesopotamian Journal of CyberSecurity · doi:10.58496/mjcs/2025/066 · Cited by 4
Lightweight FPGA-Based Number-Theoretic Transform for ML-KEM in Post-Quantum Cryptography
Alshomrany, M. O., Al-Hashimi, M., Alsolami, F., Saleh, M., Abulnaja, O. A., Al-Somani, T. F., & Altuwaijri, A. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3638925 · Cited by 4
Mellese, D. W., Tefera, Z. G., Belay, M. B., Seffa, G. H., Negewo, A. G., Gizachew, Z., Atinaf, M. A., & Adamu, D. M. (2026) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2026.3655100 · Cited by 4
Rydecki, J., Panwar, G., & Lavrova, O. (2025) · doi:10.1145/3733820.3764681 · Cited by 4
A Secure-by-Design Post-Quantum Architecture for Industrial Control Systems
Gupta, A., & Mittal, S. (2026) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2026.3692633 · Cited by 4
Cyber Security and Data Ownership
Vrana, J. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-84477-5_79 · Cited by 4
A generalized approach to root-based attacks against PLWE
Blanco-Chacón, I., Dı́az, R. D., & Sánchez-Ledesma, R. M. (2025) · Cryptography and Communications · doi:10.1007/s12095-025-00849-9 · Cited by 4
Mamun, A. A., Yates, K., Rakotondrafara, A., Chowdhury, M. A., Cartor, R., & Gao, S. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.02461 · Cited by 4
NIST first call for multi-party threshold schemes
Brandao, L. T. D. N., & Peralta, R. (2026) · doi:10.6028/nist.ir.8214c · Cited by 4
Post-Quantum Cryptography: Current Developments, Challenges, and Future Directions
Fernando, W. (2025) · Path of Science · doi:10.22178/pos.119-4 · Cited by 3
Cracking the Mask: SASCA Against Local-Masked NTT for CRYSTALS-Kyber
Rodriguez, R. C., Bruguier, F., Valea, E., & Benoit, P. (2025) · IACR Communications in Cryptology · doi:10.62056/aesgbnja5 · Cited by 3
Verifiable Decapsulation: Recognizing Faulty Implementations of Post-quantum KEMs
Glabush, L., Günther, F., Hövelmanns, K., & Stebila, D. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-01881-6_17 · Cited by 3
Sparse-Aware NTT: Accelerating Lattice-Based Cryptography on FPGAs
Bohra, D. D., Banerjee, D. S., & Sanadhya, S. K. (2025) · IEEE Computer Society Annual Symposium on VLSI · doi:10.1109/isvlsi65124.2025.11130302 · Cited by 3
Public Key Linting for ML-KEM and ML-DSA
Karatsiolis, E., Kiefer, F., Krämer, J., Loiero, M., Tobias, C., & Weishäupl, M. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-01806-9_18 · Cited by 3
Compact Lattice-Coded (Multi-recipient) Kyber Without CLT Independence Assumption
Liu, S., & Sakzad, A. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-5099-9_12 · Cited by 3
Side-Channel Attacks on VOLEitH Signature Schemes
Jendral, S., & Dubrova, E. (2026) · IACR Communications in Cryptology · doi:10.62056/aebngyl7s · Cited by 3
Birgin, B., & Çeliktaş, B. (2026) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2026.3669437 · Cited by 3
Post-Quantum DAG-Based Blockchain for Securing Vehicular Sensor Networks
Ahmed, S., Tariq, N., Khan, F. A., & Chauhdary, S. H. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics · doi:10.1109/tce.2026.3688933 · Cited by 3
Raj, R. D. A., Krishna, A., Rajasekar, B., Pallakonda, A., Yanamala, R. M. R., Pouresmaeil, E., & Aghaei, J. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems · doi:10.1109/tsmc.2026.3687494 · Cited by 3
SoK: Reassessing Side-Channel Vulnerabilities and Countermeasures in PQC Implementations
Dobiáš, P., Rezaeezade, A., Batina, L., Chmielewski, Ł., & Malina, L. (2026) · ACM Asia Conference on Computer and Communications Security (ASIA CCS) · doi:10.1145/3779208.3785290 · Cited by 3
HIC Is All You Need: Practical Post-Quantum Password-Authenticated Public-Key Encryption
Arriaga, A., Mestel, D., Oupický, J., Rønne, P. B., & Škrobot, M. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-22931-1_5 · Cited by 3
Mind the Gap: Policy vs Reality in Post-Quantum TLS Deployment
Wickramasinghe, N., Li, F., Jha, S., & Shaghaghi, A. (2026) · ACM Internet Measurement Conference (IMC) · doi:10.1145/3777912.3839797 · Cited by 3
Alrowaili, A., Ozmen, S. C., Kazim, M., & Rehman, M. U. (2026) · IET Smart Cities · doi:10.1049/smc2.70040 · Cited by 3
Optimizing Systolic Array-Based NTT Accelerators
Mulhem, S., Schultz, E., Groth, L., Bereković, M., & Buchty, R. (2025) · IEEE Embedded Systems Letters · doi:10.1109/les.2025.3562707 · Cited by 3
Seedorf, J., Rawal, D., Möwes, J., Abdulaziz, O. H., Alhasan, A., & Santhanavanich, T. (2025) · The international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences · doi:10.5194/isprs-archives-xlviii-4-w16-2025-113-2025 · Cited by 3
Advances in Reed-Solomon Code-Based Masking and Application to ML-KEM
Berthet, P.-A., Rougeolle, Y., Tavernier, C., & Sauvage, L. (2025) · IACR Communications in Cryptology · doi:10.62056/a6n59qxqi · Cited by 3
Highly Reliable and Secure System With Multi-Layer Parallel LDPC and Kyber for 5G Communications
Nguyen, L., Phan, Q. B., & Nguyen, T. T. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3485875 · Cited by 3
Arakawa, M. (2025) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.176118722.22701360/v1 · Cited by 3
Iskander, R., & Kirah, K. A. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.03813 · Cited by 3
Iskander, R., & Kirah, K. A. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.15249 · Cited by 3
Balaji, H., Varshney, A., Ravi, P., Jain, S., Foe, R., Seet, J., Wang, H., Lam, K.-Y., & Chattopadhyay, A. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.17955 · Cited by 3
Efficient Verifiable Mixnets from Lattices, Revisited
Bootle, J., Lyubashevsky, V., & Merino-Gallardo, A. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-91823-0_8 · Cited by 2
Performance Evaluation of Quantum-Resistant Algorithms on Industrial Embedded Systems
Reichert, L., Coppik, N., & Finster, S. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-00630-1_8 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
- Published
- 2024-08-13
- OpenAlex
- W4401459825
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 184 · 2025: 76 · 2024: 8
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica (CWI), the national research institute for mathematics and computer science in the Netherlands (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Standards and Technology
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Cryptography and Data Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cryptography and Residue Arithmetic
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Keywords
- key encapsulation mechanism, ML-KEM, module lattices, module learning with errors, post-quantum cryptography, key establishment, shared secret key, lattice-based cryptography, parameter sets
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
