The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Current Standards Landscape for Smart Manufacturing Systems
Open accessAbstract
Today's manufacturers face ever-increasing demands of variability-greater customization, smaller lot sizes, sudden supply-chain changes and disruptions.Successful manufacturers will have to choose and incorporate technologies that help them quickly adapt to rapid change and to elevate product quality while optimizing use of energy and resources.These technologies form the core of an emerging, information-centric, Smart Manufacturing System that maximizes the flow and re-use of data throughout the enterprise.The ability of disparate systems, however, to exchange, understand, and exploit product, production, and business data rests critically on information standards.This report provides a review of the body of pertinent standards-a standards landscape-upon which future smart manufacturing systems will rely.This landscape comprises integration standards within and across three manufacturing lifecycle dimensions: product, production system, and business.We discuss opportunities and challenges for new standards, and present emerging activities addressing these opportunities.This report will allow manufacturing practitioners to better understand those standards useful to integration of smart manufacturing technologies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“As a result of the smart factory concept implementation, Lean, Flexible, Sustainable, Digital, Cloud, Intelligent, Holonic, Additive and Agile manufacturing models have been defined [3], [4], based on utilization of specific groups of I4.0 enabling technologies and their impact on the entire industrial value chain.”
From SCADA Systems With Focus on Continuous Manufacturing and Steel Industry: A Survey on Architectures, Standards, Challenges and Industry 5.0 (2022) · cites this paper as [4]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“As constructive as these architectural alignments are, they also bring to the surface the fundamental differences in some aspects that prevent higher degrees of convergence between the reference architectures.Apart from the starting viewpoints and approaches, these differences are partly the result of the application of different basic and industry-specific standards [4], [108]”
From SCADA Systems With Focus on Continuous Manufacturing and Steel Industry: A Survey on Architectures, Standards, Challenges and Industry 5.0 (2022) · cites this paper as [4]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis
Coelli, T. J., Rao, D. S. P., O’Donnell, C. J., & Battese, G. E. (2005) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/b136381 · Cited by 6,926
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
(2017) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1081/e-elis4-120044744 · Cited by 539
Supply chain excellence : a handbook for dramatic improvement using the SCOR model
Bolstorff, P., & Rosenbaum, R. (2003) · Thammasat University Digital Collections · Cited by 333
Amoako‐Gyampah, K., & Acquaah, M. (2007) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.02.030 · Cited by 305
Agile Manufacturing: The 21st Century Competitive Strategy
Gunasekaran, A. (2001) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-043567-1.x5000-1 · Cited by 138
Global Information Architecture for Industrial Automation
Vogel‐Heuser, B., Kegel, G., & Wucherer, K. (2013) · atp magazin · doi:10.17560/atp.v51i01-02.1948 · Cited by 123
A Portrait of an ISO STEP Tolerancing Standard as an Enabler of Smart Manufacturing Systems
Feeney, A. B., Frechette, S., & Srinivasan, V. (2014) · Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.4029050 · Cited by 113
Self-citationEncyclopedia Britannica online
(2003) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40sup-0010 · Cited by 97
Emerging Global Trends in Advanced Manufacturing
Shipp, S., Gupta, N., Lal, B., Scott, J. A., Weber, C. L., Finnin, M. S., Blake, M., Newsome, S., & Thomas, S. (2012) · Cited by 80
AutomationML: From data exchange to system planning and simulation
Faltinski, S., Niggemann, O., Moriz, N., & Mankowski, A. (2012) · IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT) · doi:10.1109/icit.2012.6209967 · Cited by 38
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- J. Davis , T. Edgar, J. Porter, J. Bernaden, M. Sarli, Smart Manufacturing, manufacturing intelligence and demand-dynamics performance. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2012, 47,145-156.
- SMLC, Implementing 21 st Century Smart Manufacturing: Workshop Summary Report, June 2011, http://www.energetics.com /resourcecenter/products/roadmaps/Documents/SMLC_Smart_Manufacturing.pdf, Access date March 8, 2015.
- P. Witherell, B. Kulvatunyou, and S. Rachu, Toward the Synthesis of Product Knowledge across the Lifecycle, Proceedings of the ASME 2013 International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition IMECE2013, November 13-21, 2013, San Diego, California, USA
- NIST Workshop on Open Cloud Architectures for Smart Manufacturing, http://www.nist.gov/el/msid/opencloudarch.cfm
- A. V. Euler-Chelpin, Information modelling for the manufacturing system life cycle, Doctoral Thesis, KTH -Production Engineering, Stockholm, Sweden, 2008, ISSN 1650-1888
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kusiak, A. (2018) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2017.1351644 · Cited by 1,330
“Industrie 4.0” and Smart Manufacturing – A Review of Research Issues and Application Examples
Thoben, K., Wiesner, S., Wuest, T., & Industrial and Management Systems Engineering (2017) · International Journal of Automation Technology · doi:10.20965/ijat.2017.p0004 · Cited by 1,148
Smart manufacturing: Characteristics, technologies and enabling factors
Mittal, S., Khan, M. A., Romero, D., & Wuest, T. (2017) · Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part B Journal of Engineering Manufacture · doi:10.1177/0954405417736547 · Cited by 564
Lu, Y., Xu, X. W., & Wang, L. (2020) · Journal of Manufacturing Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.06.010 · Cited by 531
Self-citationImpacts of Industry 4.0 technologies on Lean principles
Rosin, F., Forget, P., Samir Lamouri, A., & Pellerin, R. (2019) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2019.1672902 · Cited by 450
Metadata
- Authors
- Lu, Y., Morris, K., & Frechette, S.
- ORCID
- Lu, Yan
- Published
- 2016-02
- OpenAlex
- W2623083822
- Cited by
- 360
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 7
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- public-domain
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Manufacturing Process and Optimization
- Keywords
- smart manufacturing systems, information standards, manufacturing integration, product life cycle, production systems, data reuse, manufacturing variability, supply chain disruption, customization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
