Interagency report on the status of international cybersecurity standardization for the internet of things (IoT)
Open accessAbstract
Reports on Computer Systems TechnologyThe Information Technology Laboratory (ITL) at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) promotes the U.S. economy and public welfare by providing technical leadership for the Nation's measurement and standards infrastructure.ITL develops tests, test methods, reference data, proof of concept implementations, and technical analyses to advance the development and productive use of information technology.ITL's responsibilities include the development of management, administrative, technical, and physical standards and guidelines for the cost-effective security and privacy of other than national security-related information in federal information systems.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Different NIST standards are implemented in IIoT, such as NIST 800-53, NIST 800-82, and NIST Cybersecurity Framework.
“Different NIST standards are implemented in IIoT, such as NIST 800-53, NIST 800-82, and NIST Cybersecurity Framework [43,44].”
From Industrial IoT, Cyber Threats, and Standards Landscape: Evaluation and Roadmap (2021) · cites this paper as [44]
The Cybersecurity Objectives section says NIST SP 800-82’s industrial-control security objectives can be adapted for IoT, and the Figure 10 discussion says a Cybersecurity Framework manufacturing profile may help manage IoT risks. SP 800-53 appears in a list of NIST publications, but the report does not establish that it—or all three named resources—is implemented in IIoT. The claim overstates the report’s discussion of applicability as implementation. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 11 · Cited by 33
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- S. Gupta, Implantable Medical Devices -Cyber Risks and Mitigation Approaches, NIST Cyber Physical Systems Workshop April 23-24, 2012, https://csrc.nist.gov/presentations/2012/implantable-medical-devices-cyber- risks-and-miti
- Industrial Internet of Things Volume G4: Security Framework, Industrial This publication is available free of charge from: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.8200 Internet Consortium, September 2016, 173 pp. https://www.iiconsortium.org/pdf/IIC_PUB_G4_V1.00_PB.pdf · DOI
- IEEE P2413, Standard for an Architectural Framework for the Internet of Things (IoT). https://standards.ieee.org/develop/project/2413.html
- Authors
- Hogan, M., & Piccarreta, B.
- Published
- 2018-11
- OpenAlex
- W2893006158
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Funders
- Information Technology Laboratory
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
- Keywords
- Internet of Things, international standards, Internet of Things security, IoT privacy, inter-agency coordination
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
