The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Overview of the third text Retrieval conference (TREC-3)
Abstract
This paper provides an overviewofthe TREC-3 conference, including a reviewofthe TREC task, a very brief description of the test collection being used, and an overviewofthe results. The papers from the individual groups should be referred to for more details on specific system approaches
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Naive (Bayes) at forty: The independence assumption in information retrieval
Lewis, D. D. (1998) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/bfb0026666 · Cited by 2,104
An overview of MetaMap: historical perspective and recent advances
Aronson, A. R., & Lang, F.-M. (2010) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/jamia.2009.002733 · Cited by 1,519
Quary Expansion Using Local and Global Document Analysis
Xu, J., & Croft, W. B. (2017) · ACM SIGIR Forum · doi:10.1145/3130348.3130364 · Cited by 1,252
How reliable are the results of large-scale information retrieval experiments?
Zobel, J. (1998) · Proceedings of the 21st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval · doi:10.1145/290941.291014 · Cited by 579
Test Collection Based Evaluation of Information Retrieval Systems
Sanderson, M. (2010) · Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1561/1500000009 · Cited by 485
Metadata
- Authors
- Harman, D. K.
- Published
- 1995
- OpenAlex
- W2887107689
- Cited by
- 378
- References
- 0
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Overview of the third text Retrieval conference (TREC-3). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.6028/nist.sp.500-225
- The paper
- Harman, D. K. (1995). Overview of the third text Retrieval conference (TREC-3). https://doi.org/10.6028/nist.sp.500-225
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
