The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Guide to Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems (IDPS)
Open accessAbstract
The Information Technology Laboratory (ITL) at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) promotes the U.S. economy and public welfare by providing technical leadership for the nation's measurement and standards infrastructure.ITL develops tests, test methods, reference data, proof of concept implementations, and technical analysis to advance the development and productive use of information technology.ITL's responsibilities include the development of technical, physical, administrative, and management standards and guidelines for the cost-effective security and privacy of sensitive unclassified information in Federal computer systems.This Special Publication 800-series reports on ITL's research, guidance, and outreach efforts in computer security and its collaborative activities with industry, government, and academic organizations.Certain commercial entities, equipment, or materials may be identified in this document in order to describe an experimental procedure or concept adequately.Such identification is not intended to imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor is it intended to imply that the entities, materials, or equipment are necessarily the best available for the purpose.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“At the process layer, protection technologies like firewalls, intrusion detection systems, and role-based access controls are required to align with defined policies to provide concrete safeguards [7].”
From Seamless Industry 4.0 Integration: A Multilayered Cyber-Security Framework for Resilient SCADA Deployments in CPPS (2023) · cites this paper as [7]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.
Use of the Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) vulnerability naming scheme
Mell, P., & Grance, T. (2002) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-51 · Cited by 50
Self-citationIngenhoven, C. (2010) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.11129/detail.9783955531713.18 · Cited by 4
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security
Stouffer, K., Pillitteri, V., Lightman, S., Abrams, M., & Hahn, A. (2015) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-82r2 · Cited by 1,377
A survey of intrusion detection in Internet of Things
Zarpelão, B. B., Miani, R. S., Kawakani, C. T., & de Alvarenga, S. C. (2017) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2017.02.009 · Cited by 1,022
An empirical comparison of botnet detection methods
García, S., Grill, M., Stiborek, J., & Zunino, A. (2014) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2014.05.011 · Cited by 962
A survey of intrusion detection techniques in Cloud
Modi, C., Patel, D., Borisaniya, B., Patel, H. B., Patel, A., & Rajarajan, M. (2012) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2012.05.003 · Cited by 897
Xie, J., Yu, F. R., Huang, T., Xie, R., Liu, J., Wang, C., & Liu, Y. (2019) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2018.2866942 · Cited by 700
Metadata
- Authors
- Scarfone, K. A., & Mell, P. M.
- Affiliations
- National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
- Published
- 2007
- OpenAlex
- W2678934292
- Cited by
- 1,279
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 81 · 2025: 92 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 86 · 2018: 77 · 2017: 78 · 2016: 84 · 2015: 76 · 2014: 82 · 2013: 91 · 2012: 71
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- public-domain
- Funders
- U.S. Department of State
- Cisco Systems
- National Institute of Standards and Technology
- Army Research Laboratory
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Network Packet Processing and Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Immune Systems Applications
- Keywords
- intrusion detection systems, intrusion prevention systems, network security, cybersecurity, security testing, security standards
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review