The DOI matches its DataCite record.
COVID-19-policy dataset
Open accessAbstract
This dataset is a zip file of policy documents from Jan 1st - Marc 31st 2020 relating to COVID-19 pandemic. The documents are in PDF format and have an accompanying JSON file explaining their provenance: where they were collected from, their publication date, original location etc. You can read more about it here: https://blog.overton.io/?p=73
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In a larger dataset, two of the top 10 journals which are being cited in policy documents were found to be preprint servers (medRxiv and SSRN in fifth and eighth position, respectively) [40].”
From The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of COVID-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape (2021) · cites this paper as [40]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fraser, N., Brierley, L., Dey, G., Polka, J. K., Pálfy, M., Nanni, F., & Coates, J. A. (2021) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000959 · Cited by 555
Metadata
- Authors
- Adie, E.
- Venue
- figshare
- Publisher
- figshare
- Published
- 2020
- OpenAlex
- W4394292189
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 2
- Type
- dataset
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- Locations
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Figshare (cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Communication and COVID-19 Impact
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
- Keywords
- COVID-19 pandemic, pandemic policy, government policy documents, public health policy, document provenance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
