ARRIVE guidelines for Stage 1 Registered Report_Refinement of tickling protocols to improve positive animal welfare in laboratory rats.pdf.
Open accessAbstract
ARRIVE checklist
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
All animal work was carried out in accordance with the U.K. Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 and reported in compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines.
“All animal work was carried out at the Roslin Institute, Edinburgh, U.K., in accordance with the U.K. Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 and reported in compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines ( Bombail, 2022).”
From Stage 2 Registered Report: Refinement of tickling protocols to improve positive animal welfare in laboratory rats (2025) · cites this paper as Bombail, 2022
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bombail, V., Brown, S. M., Beyts, C., Martin, J. E., Li, T., Meddle, S. L., Mendl, M., Robinson, E. S., Hammond, T. J., Nielsen, B. L., et al. (2025) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.166417.2 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Bombail, V.
- Corresponding author
- Bombail, Vincent
- ORCID
- Bombail, Vincent
- Venue
- figshare
- Publisher
- figshare
- Published
- 2022
- OpenAlex
- W6939373265
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- public-domain
- creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode
- Locations
- Figshare (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- Figshare (public-domain)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
- Keywords
- tickling, laboratory rats, animal welfare, animal handling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
