The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Metadata for all DOIs in Crossref: JSON MongoDB exports of all works from the Crossref API
Abstract
crossref-works.json.xz contains Crossref metadata for 87,542,370 DOIs retrieved by querying works from the Crossref API. Queries began on 2017-03-21 and completed on 2017-04-02. The process died or stalled several times, but was restarted using the API's cursor. Accordingly, the works should represent the Crossref database as of 2017-03-21. crossref-works.json.xz is an xz-compressed file of exported works from MongoDB. It was created using mongoexport and can be imported into MongoDB using mongoimport. The file as a whole is not actually valid JSON. However, each line of the file is valid JSON and encodes a single work retrieved from the Crossref API. Accordingly, you can read this file without mongoimport by splitting at newlines and parsing each line as JSON. See https://git.io/vSzIU for more information. The versioned shortDOI for this figshare article is https://doi.org/b48h.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The study identified 708,282 deleted DOIs by comparing Crossref DOI datasets from March 2017 and January 2021.
“Using the proposed method, 708,282 deleted DOIs were identified.”
From Analysis of the deletions of DOIs: What factors undermine their persistence and to what extent? (2022) · cites this paper as [9]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Analysis of the deletions of DOIs: What factors undermine their persistence and to what extent?
Kikkawa, J., Takaku, M., & Yoshikane, F. (2022) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-16802-4_13 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Himmelstein, D., Wheeler, K., & Greene, C.
- Venue
- figshare
- Publisher
- figshare
- Published
- 2017
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
