CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 15Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsCryospheric studies and observationsOcean Waves and Remote Sensing

Reference dataset for sea ice concentration

Open access
Pedersen, Leif Toudal, Saldo, Roberto, Ivanova, Natalia, Kern, Stefan, Heygster, Georg, Tonboe, Rasmus, Huntemann, Marcus, Ozsoy, Burcu +2 more·2018·figshare
DOI 10.6084/m9.figshare.6626549.v3
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

20190305: The 20190305 update (2.2.1) includes some updated CRREL-IMB based datafiles replacing a few empty files in the 20190207 version (2.2).20190207: Note that there was a bug in our reading of the accumulated ERA-I fields in the original dataset. For time series analysis (CRREL-IMB and OIB-backtrack), please use the ERAreruns dataset now also available here.In version 2.2 (2019-02-07) of the dataset and manual, this issue has been described and corrected. We recommend that all users use version 2.2. The RRDP is a set of comma separated ASCII files which contain reference sea ice concentrations and/or other relevant data and co-located NWP data from ERA-Interim, satellite Brightness Temperatures (TBs) extracted from the AMSR-E/AMSR2 swath datasets, ASCAT, QuikSCAT, SMOS and SMAP data to be used to for ice concentration calculations and evaluations. The dataset is easy to use by reading the files line by line, calculate Sea Ice Concentration from the given TBs and compare with the given reference SIC. Please read the included manual for additional information

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.6084/m9.figshare.6626549.v3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ice curve in Fig. 3 is fitted through consolidated ice points from the ESA CCI Sea Ice RRDP that spans several years and winter months and thus illustrates an average sea-ice curve.

    “In addition, the ice curve in Fig. 3 is fitted through the consolidated ice points from the ESA CCI Sea Ice RRDP (Pedersen et al., 2018) that spans several years and winter months and thus illustrates an average sea-ice curve.”

    From Version 2 of the EUMETSAT OSI SAF and ESA CCI sea-ice concentration climate data records (2019) · cites this paper as Pedersen et al., 2018

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pedersen, L. T., Saldo, R., Ivanova, N., Kern, S., Heygster, G., Tonboe, R., Huntemann, M., Ozsoy, B., Ardhuin, F., & Kaleschke, L.
ORCID
Venue
figshare
Publisher
figshare
Published
2018
DOI
10.6084/m9.figshare.6626549.v3
OpenAlex
W4394512898
Cited by
15
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5
Type
dataset
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing
Keywords
sea ice concentration, reference dataset, ERA5 reanalysis, ERA-Interim reanalysis, satellite brightness temperature, AMSR-E, AMSR2, ASCAT, QuikSCAT, SMOS, SMAP, open water, numerical weather prediction, backtracking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review