Examining the Principle of Good Faith in Chinese Judicial Practice with a Focus on the New Civil Code (Enacted in 2021)
Open accessAbstract
یکی از اصول حقوقی مهم در حقوق به ویژه در قلمرو قراردادها، اصل حسن نیت می باشد. در نظام حقوقی چین چه در قوانین سابق و چه در قانون مدنی جدید مصوب 2021، حسن نیت به رسمیت شناخته شده است. دادگاه های چین در استناد به اصل حسن نیت محدودیت خاصی ندارند و گاهاً مفهوم حسن نیت و انصاف را مترداف تلقی می نمایند. در نظام حقوقی چین وظیفه حسن نیت محدود به مرحله اجرای قرارداد نمی باشد، بلکه در کلیه مراحل یک رابطه قراردادی از مذاکرات پیش قراردادی تا مرحله انحلال قرارداد و رد عوضین، طرفین مکلف به رعایت حسن نیت می باشند. قانون مدنی جدید چین اولین قانون جامع و کامل در حوزه حقوق خصوصی کشور چین است که منبعث از قوانین خاص متعدد گذشته می باشد لیکن دارای نوآوری های بسیاری در حوزه قراردادها و موضوعات روز مانند حفاظت از محیط زیست ، قراردادهای هوشمندو... می باشد لذا می توان گفت از این حیث، قانونی پیشگام و همگام با آخرین تحولات جهانی می باشد.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the Liang case, the court neutralized the plaintiff's claim by focusing on his status as a zhíyè dǎjiārén, deeming his strategic purchase a violation of good faith, reclassifying the product as a 'primary agricultural product' exempt from strict labelling rules, and reducing the false green claim to a mere 'formal defect' incapable of triggering punitive damages.
“The court, however, pivoted away from the product's non-compliance. It focused instead on the plaintiff's status as a zhíyè dǎjiārén , deeming his strategic purchase a violation of the foundational principle of good faith ( chéngshí xìnyòng , 诚实信用 ) (cf.Leonhard 2009, 305; Novaretti 2010, 946; Khosravi 2024, 112). It then reclassified the product as a 'primary agricultural product' ( chūjí n”
From Green Labels, Red Flags: Comparative Legal Pathways to Environmental Legitimacy in the European Union and the People’s Republic of China (2025) · cites this paper as Khosravi 2024, 112
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Amini, Mansour and Yahya Ebrahimi (2011). Good Faith in Contracts: From Theory to Practice, Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 2, No. 2, p. 23
- Liang huixing, good faith principle and gap-filling, chinese journal of law(1994,vol.2)..
- Lou gianbo and liu yan, limitis to the principle of freedom of contract and relation ship with the principle of good faith,peking university law journal(1995),vol.6
- patricia pattison and Daniel herron , themountains are high and the emperor id far away:sancity of contract in china , American business law journal
- xu, guiding, two nots on the principle of good faith,chinese journal of law(2002),vol4.
- Liang huixing, good faith principle and gap-filling, chinese journal of law(1994,vol.2)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
- Authors
- Khosravi, F.
- Affiliations
- University of Guilan (IR)
- Corresponding author
- Khosravi, Farshid
- Venue
- Ahrar Private Law Research Journal
- Publisher
- Apex Publishing
- Published
- 2024-02-25
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1-100
- ISSN
- 2821-2703 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4399259102
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- fa
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Ahrar Private Law Research Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal principles and applications
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Comparative International Legal Studies
- Social Sciences › Law › European and International Contract Law
- Keywords
- good faith principle, contract law, judicial practice, contract fairness, contract formation, contract performance, contract termination, contract rescission, Chinese law
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
