The Evolution of Drones and the Counter-Drone Systems challenges in the field of contemporary warfare
Open accessAbstract
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and unmanned aerial systems (UAS) have emerged as the fastest-growing and most transformative technological development in modern warfare since the introduction of tanks and aircraft in the early 20th century. Originally designed for reconnaissance and intelligence gathering, drones have evolved into cost-effective, highly lethal platforms capable of reshaping tactical, operational, and strategic dynamics on the battlefield. The Second Nagorno-Karabakh War (2020) became the first widely recognized “drone war,” demonstrating that relatively inexpensive UAVs could decisively neutralize traditional armored formations, air defense networks, and other high-value military assets. Following this, the Russia–Ukraine War (2022–2025) scaled the phenomenon to a global level, where drones assumed not only tactical relevance but also operational-strategic significance, influencing force deployment, campaign planning, and defense-industrial production. By November 2025, first-person view (FPV) and kamikaze drones, costing between $400 and $1,500, accounted for 62–70% of confirmed equipment losses in Ukraine and over 90% in Nagorno-Karabakh. This creates an unprecedented economic asymmetry, with cost ratios reaching up to 1:25000, challenging long-standing assumptions of force parity and effectiveness. Conventional counter-unmanned aircraft systems (C-UAS) have repeatedly proven insufficient against autonomous, fiber-optic-guided, and swarm-capable drones, exposing critical vulnerabilities in contemporary air defense doctrines. This paper conducts a detailed comparative analysis of the two conflicts, highlighting technological innovations, economic drivers, and tactical doctrines behind drone effectiveness. It examines the limitations of current C-UAS technologies and proposes a conceptual framework for a next-generation, multi-layered defensive architecture. The study underscores the profound strategic implications of drone proliferation and provides actionable insights for military planners, defense industries, and policymakers seeking to address the evolving challenges posed by unmanned aerial systems in modern warfare.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
No citation lists for this paper
- Authors
- Eprikian, L. P., Sanadze, G., & Beridze, L. D.
- Affiliations
- Georgian Technical University (GE)
- Venue
- თავდაცვა და მეცნიერება
- Published
- 2025-12-24
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 2720-8184 (ISSN-L)
- 2960-9658
- 2720-8710
- OpenAlex
- W7117126635
- Semantic Scholar
- 0fb2d3c902fecbb54b3e5d580cd435a12ccd55da
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- თავდაცვა და მეცნიერება (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Military Technology and Strategies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Military Strategy and Technology
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Military Defense Systems Analysis
- Keywords
- unmanned aerial vehicles, counter-UAS, drone warfare, Russian invasion of Ukraine, first-person view drones, kamikaze drones, UAV swarms, air defense
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review