Cited by 17

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Hybridization in free-ranging Callithrix flaviceps and the taxonomy of the Atlantic forest marmosets

Mendes, Sérgio Lucena·1997·Neotropical Primates

Abstract

No abstract

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.62015/np.1997.v5.367

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The New World genus Callithrix is one primate taxon for which reports of recent hybridization have increased substantially.

    “The New World genus Callithrix , made up of six species of eastern Brazilian marmosets ( C. jacchus , C. penicillata , C. aurita , C. flaviceps , C. geoffroyi and C. kuhlii ), is one primate taxon for which reports of recent hybridization have increased substantially (e.g., Rylands et al. 1988; Mendes 1997a, b; Passamani et al. 1997; Ruiz-Miranda et al. 2000; Affonso et al. 2004; Ruiz-Miranda et a”

    From Morphological Variation in Wild Marmosets (Callithrix penicillata and C. geoffroyi) and Their Hybrids (2014) · cites this paper as Mendes 1997a

    The paper reports hybrids at six sites in contact zones involving C. flaviceps and describes these as findings from recent attempts to obtain new information (Abstract; page unavailable). It therefore supports Callithrix as an example with recent hybridization reports, but does not establish that the number of reports increased substantially over time. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Alonso, C., Faria, D. S. de, Langguth, A., and Santee, D. F. 1987. Variagño da pelagem na área de intergradacño entre Callithrix jacchus e Callithrix penicillata. Rev. Brasil. Biol. 47(4):465-478.
  2. Ávila-Pires, F. D. 1969. Taxonomia e zoogeografia do género Callithrix Erxleben, 1777 (Primates, Callitrichidae). Rev. Brasil. Biol. 29(1):46.
  3. Coimbra-Filho, A. F., Mittermeier, R. A. and Constable, 1.D. 1981. Callithrix flaviceps (Thomas, 1903) recorded from Minas Gerais, Brazil (Callitrichidae, Primates). Rev. Brasil. Biol. 41(1):141-147.
  4. Coimbra-Filho, A. F., Pissinatti, A., and Rylands, A. B. 1993. Experimental multiple hybridism and natural hy- brids among Callithrix species from eastern Brazil. In: Marmosets and Tamarins; Systematics, Behaviour, and Ecology, A. B. Rylands (ed.), pp.95-120. Oxford Uni- versity Press, Oxford,
  5. Hershkovitz, P. 1977. Living New World Monkeys (Platyrrhini), With an Introduction to Primates, Vol. 1. Chicago University Press, Chicago.
  6. Marroig, G. 1995. Espécies ou subespécies em Callithrix. Neotropical Primates 3(1):10-13.
  7. Mittermeier, R. A. and Coimbra-Filho, A. F. 1981. Sys- tematics: Species and subspecies. In: Ecology and Be- havior of Neotropical Primates, Vol. 1, A. F. Coimbra- Filho andR. A. Mittermeier (eds.), pp.29-111. Academia Brasileira de Ciéncias, Rio de Janeiro.
  8. Natori, M. 1986. Interspecific relationships of Callithrix based on the dental characters. Primates 27(3):321-336.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mendes, S. L.
Venue
Neotropical Primates
Publisher
Re:wild
Published
1997-03-01
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
6-8
ISSN
  • 2995-2174
  • 1413-4705
Cited by
17
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review