The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Distribuição do sagüi (Callithrix jacchus) nas áreas de ocorrência do mico-leão-dourado (Leontopithecus rosalia) no estado do Rio de Janeiro
Abstract
No abstract
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Anthropogenic factors are creating new areas of marmoset species sympatry and in turn resulting in recent hybridization events.
“While hybridization does occur at natural contact points between Callithrix species (e.g., Malukiewicz 2013), the above anthropogenic factors are creating new areas of marmoset species sympatry and in turn resulting in recent hybridization events (e.g., Alonso et al. 1987; Ruiz-Miranda et al. 2000, 2006; Affonso et al. 2004; Pereira 2010; personal observation, ISO, JM, and VB).”
From Morphological Variation in Wild Marmosets (Callithrix penicillata and C. geoffroyi) and Their Hybrids (2014) · cites this paper as Ruiz-Miranda et al. 2000
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- introduzido em fragmentos de mata Atlântica, RJ. Em: A Primatologia no Brasil ¼L 8, S. L. Mendes eA. G. Chiarello (eds.), Santa Teresa, Espírito Santo.
- Dean, W 1995. With Broadax and Firebrand: The Destruc- tion of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. University of Califor- nia Press, Berkeley.
- Dietz, J. M., Dietz, L. A. e Nagagata, E. 1994. The effective use of flagship species for conservation of biodiversity: The example oflion tamarins in Brazil. Em: Creative Con- servation: lnteractive Management ofWild and Captive Ani- mais, P. ]. S. Olney, G. M. Mace eA. T. C. Feistner. (eds.), pp.32-49.
- Ferrari, S. F. 1993. Ecological differentiation in the Callitrichidae. Em: Marmosets and Tamarins: Systematics, Behaviour, and Ecology, A. B. Rylands (ed.), pp.314-328. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
- Garber, P. A. 1988. Diet, foraging patterns, and resource defense in a mixed species troop of Saguinus mystax and Saguinus fuscicollis in Amazonian Peru. Behaviour 105(1-2): 18-34.
- Kleiman, D. G., Beck, B. B., Baker, A. J., Ballou, J. D., Dietz, L. A. e Dietz, J. M. 1990. The conservation pro- gram for the golden lion tamarin, Leontopithecus rosalia. Endangered Species Update 8(1): 82-85.
- Kleiman, D. G., Hoage, R. J. e Green, K. M. 1988. The lion tamarins, genus Leontopithecus. Em: Ecology and Be- havior of Neotropical Primates. R. A. Mittermeier, A. F. Coimbra-Filho, A. B. Rylands e G. A. B. da Fonseca (eds.), pp.299-347. World Wildlife Fund-US, Washington, DC.
- Lopes, M. A. e Ferrari, S. F. 1994. Foraging behavior of a tamarin group (Saguinus fuscicollis weddellz) and interac- tions with marmosets ( Callithrix emiliae). lnt. J Primatol. 15(3): 373-387.
- Rylands, A. B. e Faria, D. S. de.1993. Habitats, feeding ecology; and home range size in the genus Callithrix. Em: Marmosets and Tamarins: Systmuttics, Behaviour, andEcology,A. B. Rylands (ed.), pp.262-272. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fuzessy, L. F., Silva, I. D. O., Malukiewicz, J., Silva, F. F. R., Pônzio, M. D. C., Boere, V., & Ackermann, R. R. (2014) · Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1007/s11692-014-9284-5 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Ruiz-Miranda, C. R., Affonso, A. G., Martins, A., & Beck, B.
- Venue
- Neotropical Primates
- Publisher
- Re:wild
- Published
- 2000-09-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 98-101
- ISSN
- 2995-2174
- 1413-4705
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
