The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Analyzing Risk Management in Procurement Processes: A Case Study of Chinsali-Nakonde Road
Abstract
During the entire construction phase, road construction companies face numerous hazards in the procurement process. Risk affects many aspects of operations, profitability, and reputation in the supply chain. These risks can include bad logistics, supplier defaults, natural disasters, or unstable geopolitical events. The main objective of this study was to analyze risk management in project procurement options used on the Chinsali-Nakonde road construction project. Primary data was gathered using a semi-structured questionnaire with both closed- and open-ended questions. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26 was used for data entry and statistical analysis. Graphical presentation of descriptive statistics was done using Microsoft Excel 365. Chi-square was used for inferential statistics in order to determine the relationships between the variables. The study highlights significant challenges related to cost overruns in construction projects, with 69.7% of respondents frequently encountering this issue, and a strong statistical correlation between educational background and the frequency of cost overruns, as indicated by a Pearson Chi-Square value of 25.109 (p < 0.001). Supplier failure emerged as a critical concern, rated as "very significant" or "extremely significant" by over 74% of participants, while supplier delays were reported as a lesser issue, with 79% of respondents rarely experiencing them. Quality control measures were recognized as essential to project success, with 66.7% of respondents acknowledging their contribution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“many projects in IT, construction and infrastructure suffering from ineffective risk handling, leading to frequent abandonments, disputes, and economic losses”
From Examining the Effectiveness of Risk Management Processes in Enhancing Project Completion and Overall. Case Study of ZAMTEL 5G Digital Project (2026) · cites this paper as Ngosa & Chibomba, 2025
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Sandra Ngosa, Dr. Kelvin Chibomba (2025) Analyzing Risk Management in Procurement Processes: A Case Study of Chinsali-Nakonde Road. Int j adv multidisc res stud 5(2):24-32.
Cited by
Samboko, R., & Kazembe, L. (2026) · International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology · doi:10.38124/ijisrt/26jan909
Metadata
- Authors
- Ngosa, S., & Chibomba, D. K.
- Venue
- International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies
- Publisher
- OPRA Publications
- Published
- 2025-03-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 24-32
- ISSN
- 2583-049X
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analyzing Risk Management in Procurement Processes: A Case Study of Chinsali-Nakonde Road. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.62225/2583049x.2025.5.2.3806
- The paper
- Ngosa, S., & Chibomba, D. K. (2025). Analyzing Risk Management in Procurement Processes: A Case Study of Chinsali-Nakonde Road. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies. https://doi.org/10.62225/2583049x.2025.5.2.3806
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.