Cited by 4Brain Tumor Detection and ClassificationAI in cancer detectionMedical Image Segmentation Techniques

YOLO v10-Based Brain Tumor Detection: An Innovative Approach in CT Imaging

Open access
Haewon Byeon·2024·Nanotechnology Perceptions

Abstract

This study explores the application of the YOLO v10 model for the detection and classification of brain tumors in CT images. YOLO, known for its real-time object detection capabilities, offers a promising approach to addressing the challenges of medical imaging. The research utilizes the Brain Tumor Dataset from Kaggle, incorporating 437 negative and 488 positive images for training, with additional datasets for validation. The YOLO v10 model demonstrated superior performance compared to traditional models like AlexNet, VGG16, ResNet101V2, and MobileNetV3-Large. It achieved a precision of 0.920, recall of 0.890, F1-score of 0.900, and accuracy of 0.910. These results highlight its effectiveness in accurately identifying and classifying tumors, offering significant potential for clinical applications. The model's architecture allows for efficient processing of high-resolution CT scans, adapting well to varied tumor sizes and shapes. The study also discusses the challenges and future directions for improving computational efficiency and generalization capability in diverse datasets. The promising findings suggest that YOLO v10 can be a powerful tool in medical diagnostics, enhancing the accuracy and speed of tumor detection and contributing to better patient outcomes. This research sets a foundation for further exploration and development of YOLO-based models in healthcare.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.62441/nano-ntp.v20i6.10

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Byeon, H.
Corresponding author
Haewon Byeon
Venue
Nanotechnology Perceptions
Published
2024-10-22
Volume
20
Issue
6
ISSN
1660-6795 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403684815
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nanotechnology Perceptions (publishedVersion)
  • Nanotechnology Perceptions (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
Keywords
brain tumor detection, YOLOv10, object detection, computed tomography, medical image analysis, tumor segmentation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review