YOLO v10-Based Brain Tumor Detection: An Innovative Approach in CT Imaging
Open accessAbstract
This study explores the application of the YOLO v10 model for the detection and classification of brain tumors in CT images. YOLO, known for its real-time object detection capabilities, offers a promising approach to addressing the challenges of medical imaging. The research utilizes the Brain Tumor Dataset from Kaggle, incorporating 437 negative and 488 positive images for training, with additional datasets for validation. The YOLO v10 model demonstrated superior performance compared to traditional models like AlexNet, VGG16, ResNet101V2, and MobileNetV3-Large. It achieved a precision of 0.920, recall of 0.890, F1-score of 0.900, and accuracy of 0.910. These results highlight its effectiveness in accurately identifying and classifying tumors, offering significant potential for clinical applications. The model's architecture allows for efficient processing of high-resolution CT scans, adapting well to varied tumor sizes and shapes. The study also discusses the challenges and future directions for improving computational efficiency and generalization capability in diverse datasets. The promising findings suggest that YOLO v10 can be a powerful tool in medical diagnostics, enhancing the accuracy and speed of tumor detection and contributing to better patient outcomes. This research sets a foundation for further exploration and development of YOLO-based models in healthcare.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In healthcare, YOLO excels in automating critical tasks, such as detecting tumors in medical imaging and monitoring surgical tools during procedures.
“In healthcare, YOLO excels in automating critical tasks, such as detecting tumors in medical imaging and monitoring surgical tools during procedures [46].”
From The YOLO Framework: A Comprehensive Review of Evolution, Applications, and Benchmarks in Object Detection (2024) · cites this paper as [46]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ali, M. L., & Zhang, Z. (2024) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers13120336 · Cited by 383 · see citing works
- Authors
- Byeon, H.
- Corresponding author
- Haewon Byeon
- ORCID
- Haewon Byeon
- Venue
- Nanotechnology Perceptions
- Publisher
- Dewspublication
- Published
- 2024-10-22
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 1660-6795 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4403684815
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nanotechnology Perceptions (publishedVersion)
- Nanotechnology Perceptions (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Keywords
- brain tumor detection, YOLOv10, object detection, computed tomography, medical image analysis, tumor segmentation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review