Who owns land, who owns language? Challenging the commercialization of Indigenous language data
Open accessAbstract
As Indigenous scholars and activists have pointed out, the commercialization of Indigenous language data resembles the historical and ongoing dispossession of Indigenous land. Using Mayan languages as a case study, this article illustrates the process by which digital advertising platforms – Google and Meta – appropriate and benefit commercially from Indigenous language data, drawing parallels with the dispossession of Indigenous land. It identifies the significant costs of this commercialization to Indigenous communities, including the lack of compensation for the Indigenous language data’s commercial value, the distortion of Indigenous communities’ linguistic and cultural representation online, and the reinforcement of extractive relationships to Indigenous land, particularly through the expansion of highly resource-intensive and environmentally destructive AI infrastructures. Finally, the paper outlines various efforts to reclaim Indigenous language data, calling for broad solidarity and support for the Indigenous Data Sovereignty movement.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
- Authors
- Riemland, M.
- Affiliations
- Heriot-Watt University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Riemland, Matthew
- ORCID
- Riemland, Matthew
- Venue
- Maya America: Journal of Essays, Commentary, and Analysis
- Published
- 2026-08-05
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2688-9188 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7201971251
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-sa
- Locations
- Maya America Journal of Essays Commentary and Analysis (publishedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- DigitalCommons - Kennesaw State University (Kennesaw State University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
- Keywords
- commercialization, Indigenous data sovereignty, Mayan languages, digital advertising platforms, Google, Meta, Indigenous land dispossession, AI infrastructure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review