Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,384

The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

WordNet Affect: an Affective Extension of WordNet

Open access
Carlo Strapparava, Alessandro Valitutti·2004·Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC)

Abstract

In this paper we present a linguistic resource for the lexical representation of affective knowledge.This resource (named WORDNET-AFFECT) was developed starting from WORDNET, through a selection and tagging of a subset of synsets representing the affective meanings.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

OpenAlex · 10.63317/2yctm9q26ar4

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,384

Metadata

Authors
Strapparava, C., & Valitutti, A.
Venue
Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC)
Published
2004-05-01
OpenAlex
W2404480901
Cited by
1,384
References
1
FWCI
4.77
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: WordNet Affect: an Affective Extension of WordNet. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.63317/2yctm9q26ar4
The paper
Strapparava, C., & Valitutti, A. (2004). WordNet Affect: an Affective Extension of WordNet. Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC). https://doi.org/10.63317/2yctm9q26ar4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.