The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Annotating Events and Temporal Information in Newswire Texts
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Relative temporal expressions, which were referenced for the first time in 1998 during MUC-7 [Setzer and Gaizauskas 2000], depend on the document publication date or another date near in the context.”
From Survey of Temporal Information Retrieval and Related Applications (2015) · cites this paper as Setzer and Gaizauskas 2000
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Time is inherently associated with events [Setzer and Gaizauskas 2000].”
From Survey of Temporal Information Retrieval and Related Applications (2015) · cites this paper as Setzer and Gaizauskas 2000
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- J. Cowie and W. Lehnert. 1996. Information extraction. Communications of the ACM, 39(1):80-91.
- R. Gaizauskas and Y. Wilks. 1998. Information Extraction: Beyond Document Retrieval. Journal of Documentation, 54(1):70-105.
- M.A.K. Halliday. 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Edward Arnold. 1995. Proceedings of the Sixth Message Understanding Conference (MUC-6).
- Morgan Kaufman. 1998. Proceedings of the Seventh Message Understand- ing Conference (MUC-7). Morgan Kaufman. available at http://www.saic.com.
- A. Setzer and R. Gaizauskas. 2000. Building a Tempor- ally Annotated Corpus for Information Extraction. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Information Extrac- tion Meets Corpus Linguistics held in conjunction with the Second International Conference on Language Re- sources and Evaluation (LREC2000).
- M. Steedman. 1997. Temporality. In J. van Bentham and A. ter Meulen, editors, Handbook of Logic and Lan- guage, pages 895-938. Elsevier.
- Z. Vendler. 1967. Linguistics in Philosophy. Cornell Uni- versity Press, Ithake, New York.
- M. Vilain, J. Burger, J. Aberdeen, D. Connolly, and L. Hirschman. 1995. A Model-Theoretic Coreference Scoring Scheme. In Proceedings of the Sixth Message Understanding Conference (MUC-6).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Survey of Temporal Information Retrieval and Related Applications
Campos, R., Dias, G., Jorge, A. M., & Jatowt, A. (2015) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2619088 · Cited by 262
TIMEDIAL: Temporal Commonsense Reasoning in Dialog
Qin, L., Gupta, A., Upadhyay, S., He, L., Choi, Y., & Faruqui, M. (2021) · Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.549 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Setzer, A., & Gaizauskas, R.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference
- Published
- 2000-05
- ISSN
- 2522-2686
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
