The DOI matches its Crossref record.
STK LSF: A Motion Capture Dataset in LSF for SignToKids
Abstract
This article presents a new bilingual dataset in written French and French Sign Language (LSF), called STK LSF . This corpus is currently being produced as part of the SignToKids project. The aim of this corpus is to provide digital educational tools for deaf children, thereby facilitating the joint learning of LSF and written French. More broadly, it is intended to support future studies on the automatic processing of signed languages. To define this corpus, we focused on several grammatical phenomena typical to LSF, as well as in tales usually studied by hearing children in the second cycle in France. The corpus data represent approximately 1 hour of recording, carried out with a motion capture system (MoCap) offering a spatial precision of less than 1 mm and a temporal precision of 240 Hz. This high level of precision guarantees the quality of the data collected, which will be used both to build pedagogical scenarios in French and LSF, including signing avatar videos, and for automatic translation of text into LSF.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“RE-VIEWER2 (Reverdy et al., 2024) utilizes a twostage pipeline where one fine-tuned model first generates a set of relevant aspect prompts for a given paper, and a second model generates review text conditioned on these specific aspects.This decomposition helps lead to more detailed reviews that better cover the range of topics.”
From Can AI Be a Good Peer Reviewer? A Survey of Peer Review Process, Evaluation, and the Future (2026) · cites this paper as Reverdy et al., 2024
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- É. Bertin-Lemée, A. Braffort, C. Challant, C. Danet, B. Dauriac, M. Filhol, E. Martinod, and J. Segouat. 2022. Rosetta-lsf: an aligned corpus of french sign language and french for text-to- sign translation. In 13th Conference on Lan- guage Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2022).
- H. Brock and K. Nakadai. 2018. Deep jslc: A multi- modal corpus collection for data-driven genera- tion of japanese sign language expressions. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Con- ference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2018).
- H. Bull, A. Braffort, and M. Gouiffès. 2020. Mediapi- skel-a 2d-skeleton video database of french sign language with aligned french subtitles. In Pro- ceedings of the 12th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2020), pages 6063-6068.
- Z. Cao, T. Simon, S.E. Wei, and Y. Sheikh. 2017. Realtime multi-person 2d pose estimation using part affinity fields. pages 7291-7299.
- K. Duarte and S. Gibet. 2010. Heterogeneous data sources for signed language analysis and synthe- sis: The signcom project. In 7th Int. Conf. on Lan- guage Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2010), volume 2, pages 1-8. European Language Re- sources Association.
- J. Fink, B. Frénay, L. Meurant, and A. Cleve. 2021. Lsfb-cont and lsfb-isol: Two new datasets for vision-based sign language recognition. In 2021 International Joint Conference on Neural Net- works (IJCNN), pages 1-8. IEEE.
- S. Gibet, N. Courty, K. Duarte, and T. Le Naour. 2011. The signcom system for data-driven an- imation of interactive virtual signers : Method- ology and evaluation. In ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems, volume 1.
- T. Hanke, M. Schulder, R. Konrad, and E. Jahn. 2020. Extending the public dgs corpus in size and depth. In sign-lang@ LREC 2020, pages 75- 82. European Language Resources Association (ELRA).
- P. Jedlička, Z. Krňoul, J. Kanis, and M. Železnỳ. 2020. Sign language motion capture dataset for data-driven synthesis. In Workshop on the Rep- resentation and Processing of Sign Languages (LREC2020), pages 101-106.
- Y. Kartynnik, A. Ablavatski, I. Grishchenko, and M. Grundmann. 2019. Real-time facial surface geometry from monocular video on mobile gpus. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.06724. · arXiv
- M. Kopf, M. Schulder, and T. Hanke. 2022. The sign language dataset compendium: Creating an overview of digital linguistic resources. In Work- shop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages (LREC2022), pages 102-109.
- F. Lefebvre-Albaret, S. Gibet, A. Turki, L. Ha- mon, and R. Brun. 2013. Overview of the sign3d project high-fidelity 3d recording, index- ing and editing of french sign language con- tent. In Third International Symposium on Sign Language Translation and Avatar Technology (SLTAT) 2013.
- P. Lu and M. Huenerfauth. 2010. Collecting a motion-capture corpus of american sign lan- guage for data-driven generation research. In Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 workshop on speech and language processing for assistive technologies, pages 89-97.
- P. Lu and M. Huenerfauth. 2014. Collecting and evaluating the cuny asl corpus for research on american sign language animation. Computer Speech & Language, 28(3):812-831.
- L. Naert, C. Larboulette, and S. Gibet. 2020. Lsf- animal: A motion capture corpus in french sign language designed for the animation of signing avatars. In Proceedings of The 12th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, pages 6008-6017.
- L. Naert, C. Larboulette, and S. Gibet. 2021. Mo- tion synthesis and editing for the generation of new sign language content. Machine Translation, 35(3):405-430. · DOI
- L. Naert, C. Reverdy, C. Larboulette, and S. Gibet. 2018. Per channel automatic annotation of sign language motion capture data. In Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: Involving the Language Community (LREC 2018), Miyazaki, Japan.
- F. Nunnari, M. Filhol, and A. Heloir. 2018. Ani- mating azee descriptions using off-the-shelf ik solvers. In Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: Involving the Language Community (SignLang 2018), (LREC 2018), pages 7-12.
- G. Pavlakos, V. Choutas, N. Ghorbani, T. Bolkart, A.A.A. Osman, D. Tzionas, and M.J. Black. 2019. Expressive body capture: 3d hands, face, and body from a single image. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 10975-10985.
- C. Reverdy. 2019. Annotation et synthèse basée données des expressions faciales de la Langue des Signes Française. Ph.D. thesis, Université de Bretagne Sud.
- T. Weise, S. Bouaziz, H. Li, and M. Pauly. 2011. Realtime performance-based facial animation. ACM transactions on graphics (TOG), 30(4):1- 10.
Cited by
Can AI Be a Good Peer Reviewer? A Survey of Peer Review Process, Evaluation, and the Future
Wu, S., Jiang, O., Zhao, Y., Hu, T., Ma, Y., Zhang, K., Patwardhan, M., & Cohan, A. (2026) · Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.acl-long.1504 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Reverdy, C., Gibet, S., & Le Naour, T.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference
- Published
- 2024-05
- Pages
- 315-322
- ISSN
- 2522-2686
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: STK LSF: A Motion Capture Dataset in LSF for SignToKids. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.63317/4y9dcusqas55
- The paper
- Reverdy, C., Gibet, S., & Le Naour, T. (2024). STK LSF: A Motion Capture Dataset in LSF for SignToKids. Proceedings of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference. https://doi.org/10.63317/4y9dcusqas55
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.