The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
SENTIWORDNET: A Publicly Available Lexical Resource for Opinion Mining
Open accessAbstract
Opinion mining (OM) is a recent subdiscipline at the crossroads of information retrieval and computational linguistics which is concerned not with the topic a document is about, but with the opinion it expresses.OM has a rich set of applications, ranging from tracking users' opinions about products or about political candidates as expressed in online forums, to customer relationship management.In order to aid the extraction of opinions from text, recent research has tried to automatically determine the "PN-polarity" of subjective terms, i.e. identify whether a term that is a marker of opinionated content has a positive or a negative connotation.Research on determining whether a term is indeed a marker of opinionated content (a subjective term) or not (an objective term) has been, instead, much more scarce.In this work we describe SENTIWORDNET, a lexical resource in which each WORDNET synset s is associated to three numerical scores Obj(s), P os(s) and N eg(s), describing how objective, positive, and negative the terms contained in the synset are.The method used to develop SENTIWORDNET is based on the quantitative analysis of the glosses associated to synsets, and on the use of the resulting vectorial term representations for semi-supervised synset classification.The three scores are derived by combining the results produced by a committee of eight ternary classifiers, all characterized by similar accuracy levels but different classification behaviour.SENTIWORDNET is freely available for research purposes, and is endowed with a Web-based graphical user interface.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lexicon-based methods for sentiment analysis
Taboada, M., Brooke, J., Tofiloski, M., Voll, K., & Stede, M. (2011) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00049 · Cited by 3,301
A review of affective computing: From unimodal analysis to multimodal fusion
Poria, S., Cambria, E., Bajpai, R., & Hussain, A. (2017) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2017.02.003 · Cited by 1,644
A review on sentiment analysis and emotion detection from text
Nandwani, P., & Verma, R. (2021) · Social Network Analysis and Mining · doi:10.1007/s13278-021-00776-6 · Cited by 869
Large-scale visual sentiment ontology and detectors using adjective noun pairs
Borth, D., Ji, R., Chen, T., Breuel, T., & Chang, S.-F. (2013) · Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Multimedia · doi:10.1145/2502081.2502282 · Cited by 851
Recognizing Contextual Polarity: An Exploration of Features for Phrase-Level Sentiment Analysis
Wilson, T., Wiebe, J., & Hoffmann, P. (2009) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli.08-012-r1-06-90 · Cited by 722
Metadata
- Authors
- Esuli, A., & Sebastiani, F.
- Venue
- Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC)
- Published
- 2006-05-01
- Pages
- 417-422
- OpenAlex
- W38739846
- Cited by
- 2,480
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 36.26
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SENTIWORDNET: A Publicly Available Lexical Resource for Opinion Mining. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.63317/54vo5wjya4cw
- The paper
- Esuli, A., & Sebastiani, F. (2006). SENTIWORDNET: A Publicly Available Lexical Resource for Opinion Mining. Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC). https://doi.org/10.63317/54vo5wjya4cw
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.