CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,115Natural Language Processing TechniquesSyntax, Semantics, Linguistic VariationLinguistic Studies and Language Acquisition

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Penn Discourse TreeBank 2.0.

Prasad, Rashmi, Dinesh, Nikhil, Lee, Alan, Miltsakaki, Eleni, Robaldo, Livio, Joshi, Aravind, Webber, Bonnie·2008·Proceedings of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference
DOI 10.63317/55sr8v9kexr7
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We present the second version of the Penn Discourse Treebank, PDTB-2.0, describing its lexically-grounded annotations of discourse relations and their two abstract object arguments over the 1 million word Wall Street Journal corpus. We describe all aspects of the annotation, including (a) the argument structure of discourse relations, (b) the sense annotation of the relations, and (c) the attribution of discourse relations and each of their arguments. We list the differences between PDTB-1.0 and PDTB-2.0. We present representative statistics for several aspects of the annotation in the corpus. 1.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.63317/55sr8v9kexr7

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Prasad, R., Dinesh, N., Lee, A., Miltsakaki, E., Robaldo, L., Joshi, A., & Webber, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • University of Turin (IT)
ORCID
Venue
Proceedings of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference
Publisher
European Language Resources Association (ELRA)
Published
2008-05
Pages
2961-2968
ISSN
2522-2686
DOI
10.63317/55sr8v9kexr7
OpenAlex
W2166957049
Cited by
1,115
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 111 · 2020: 96 · 2019: 87 · 2018: 76 · 2017: 98 · 2016: 117 · 2015: 91 · 2014: 93 · 2013: 67 · 2012: 64
FWCI
25.56
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC) (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
  • Language Resources and Evaluation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic Studies and Language Acquisition
Keywords
Penn Discourse Treebank, discourse relations, argument structure, sense annotation, Wall Street Journal corpus, corpus annotation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review