Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 280

The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An Evaluation Tool for Machine Translation: Fast Evaluation for MT Research

Open access
Sonja Nießen, Franz Josef Och, Gregor Leusch, Hermann Ney·2000·Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC)

Abstract

In this paper we present a tool for the evaluation of translation quality.First, the typical requirements of such a tool in the framework of machine translation (MT) research are discussed.We define evaluation criteria which are more adequate than pure edit distance and we describe how the measurement along these quality criteria is performed semi-automatically in a fast, convenient and above all consistent way using our tool and the corresponding graphical user interface.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

OpenAlex · 10.63317/56t9t4rchhar

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 280

Metadata

Authors
Nießen, S., Och, F. J., Leusch, G., & Ney, H.
Venue
Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC)
Published
2000-05-01
OpenAlex
W1529616844
Cited by
280
References
5
FWCI
9.02
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Evaluation Tool for Machine Translation: Fast Evaluation for MT Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.63317/56t9t4rchhar
The paper
Nießen, S., Och, F. J., Leusch, G., & Ney, H. (2000). An Evaluation Tool for Machine Translation: Fast Evaluation for MT Research. Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC). https://doi.org/10.63317/56t9t4rchhar

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.