The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fostering Learner Autonomy in English for Science: A Collaborative Digital Video Project in a Technological Learning Environment
Open accessAbstract
This paper reports on the syllabus design and implementation of an English for Science and Technology (EST) course at an English-medium university in Hong Kong.The course combined elements of project-based learning and a "pedagogy for multiliteracies" (New London Group, 1996) to produce a strong learner autonomy focus.A major component of the course was a student-centered digital video project, in which students created and shared a multimodal scientific documentary.A range of new technologies and Web 2.0 platforms (including YouTube and Edublogs) were integrated into the project process in order to create a technologically rich learning environment.The design of this structured technological learning environment was informed by existing case studies of students' autonomous language learning in unstructured online spaces.In this paper, we draw on students' accounts (from questionnaires, focus group interviews, and Weblog comments) to evaluate the digital video project and associated technological environment.In particular, we describe the potential of the project to provide students with opportunities to exercise their capacities as autonomous learners within a structured language learning context.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook
(1994) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0272-4944(05)80231-2 · Cited by 48,420
The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays.
Colson, E., & Geertz, C. (1975) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2064031 · Cited by 9,103
4 What Is Web 2.0? Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software
O’Reilly, T. (2012) · The Social Media Reader · doi:10.18574/nyu/9780814764077.003.0008 · Cited by 5,601
Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings
James, M. O., & Swales, J. M. (1992) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/329786 · Cited by 4,694
(1996) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,320
Kress, G. (2003) · Taylor & Francis eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203164754 · Cited by 3,567
Social Linguistics and Literacies
Gee, J. (2015) · doi:10.4324/9781315722511 · Cited by 1,680
Digital Storytelling: A Powerful Technology Tool for the 21st Century Classroom
Robin, B. R. (2008) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1080/00405840802153916 · Cited by 1,485
Richards, K. (2003) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9780230505056 · Cited by 980
Self-Instruction in Language Learning
MacBain, W., & Dickinson, L. (1988) · Language · doi:10.2307/414557 · Cited by 857
Cited by
Using digital story writing as a pedagogy to develop AI literacy among primary students
Ng, D. T. K., Luo, W., Chan, H. M. Y., & Chu, S. K. W. (2022) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100054 · Cited by 266
Metadata
- Authors
- Hafner, C. A., & Miller, L.
- Venue
- Language Learning & Technology
- Published
- 2011-10-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 68-86
- ISSN
- 1094-3501 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2158883709
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 25.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fostering Learner Autonomy in English for Science: A Collaborative Digital Video Project in a Technological Learning Environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.64152/10125/44263
- The paper
- Hafner, C. A., & Miller, L. (2011). Fostering Learner Autonomy in English for Science: A Collaborative Digital Video Project in a Technological Learning Environment. Language Learning & Technology. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/44263
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.