Cited by 113Second Language Acquisition and LearningEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningReading and Literacy Development

Vocabulary learning through reading: Does an ELT course book provide good opportunities?

Open access
Matsuoka, Warren, Hirsh, David·2010·Reading in a Foreign Language

Abstract

This study investigates the vocabulary learning opportunities in an ELT course book designed for upper-intermediate learners. All the words appearing in the 12 chapters of the text were analyzed. The results suggest that the text would provide opportunities to deepen knowledge of the second 1,000 most frequent words in English, and would provide a context for pre-teaching of academic words met in the text for learners on an academic pathway. The results also suggest that the text would provide minimal opportunities for learners to develop vocabulary knowledge beyond high frequency and academic words. The findings suggest a need to supplement use of such texts with an extensive reading program and other forms of language rich input to promote vocabulary development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.64152/10125/66650

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most of the vocabulary employed in the upper intermediate New Headway English textbook was high frequency vocabulary, suggesting limited vocabulary learning opportunities.

    “They found most of the vocabulary employed in the textbook was high frequency vocabulary, which suggests limited vocabulary learning opportunities.”

    From The Vocabulary Knowledge of Saudi EFL Tertiary Students (2019) · cites this paper as Matsuoka and Hirsh (2010)

    Table 2 (section labeled Conclusions; page unavailable) shows that the first 2,000 most frequent words account for 90% of the textbook's running words. The Conclusions say the book offers few opportunities to expand vocabulary beyond those words and academic words, but also finds favorable opportunities to deepen knowledge of the second 1,000 words. Calling its vocabulary-learning opportunities limited without that qualification overstates the finding. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 45 · Cited by 113

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Anderson, R. C., & Freebody, P. (1981). Vocabulary and knowledge. In J. T. Gutrie (Ed.), Comprehension and teaching: Research review (pp. 77-117). Newark, DE: International Reading Assn.
  2. Bauer, L., & Nation, I. S. P. (1993). Word families. International Journal of Lexicography, 6, 253-279.
  3. Coady, J., Magoto, J., Hubbard, P., Graney, J., & Mokhtari, K. (1993). High frequency vocabulary and reading proficiency in ESL readers. In T. Huckin, M. Haynes & J. Coady Reading in a Foreign Language 22(1) (Eds.), Second language reading and vocabulary learning (pp. 217-228).
  4. Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 213-238.
  5. Dempster, F. N. (1987). Effects of variable encoding and spaced presentation on vocabulary learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 162-170.
  6. Horst, M. (2005). Learning L2 vocabulary through extensive reading: A measurement study. Canadian Modern Language Review, 61, 355-382.
  7. Hulstijn, J., Hollander, M., & Greidanus, T. (1996). Incidental vocabulary learning by advanced foreign language students: The influence of marginal glosses, dictionary use, and reoccurrence of unknown words. The Modern Language Journal, 80, 327-339.
  8. Hutchinson, T., & Torres, E. (1994). The textbook as agent of change. ELT Journal, 48, 315- 328.
  9. Klinmanee, N., & Sopprasong, L. (1997). Bridging the EFL vocabulary gap between secondary school and university: A Thai case study. Guidelines, 19(1), 1-10.
  10. Koda, K. (1989). The effects of transferred vocabulary knowledge on the development of L2 reading proficiency. Foreign Language Annals, 22, 529-540.
  11. Lake, N. (1997). Survey review: Learning training in EFL course books. ELT Journal, 51, 169- 182.
  12. Laufer, B. (1992). Reading in a foreign language: How does L2 lexical knowledge interact with the reader's general academic ability? Journal of Research in Reading, 15, 95-103.
  13. Laufer, B. (1997). The lexical plight in second language reading: Words you don't know, words you think you know, and words you can't guess. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy (pp. 20-34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  14. Laufer, B. (2003). Vocabulary acquisition in a second language: Do learners really acquire most vocabulary by reading? Some empirical evidence. Canadian Modern Language Review, 59, 565-585. Reading in a Foreign Language 22(1)
  15. Lee, S-Y. (2007). Revelations from three consecutive studies on extensive reading. RELC Journal, 38, 150-170.
  16. Masuhara, H., Hann, N., Yi, Y., & Tomlinson, B. (2008). Adult EFL courses. ELT Journal, 62, 294-312.
  17. Muhammad, R. (1990). The vocabulary demands of reading information pamphlets. Unpublished MA Thesis, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.
  18. Nagy, W. E., & Anderson, R. C. (l984). How many words are there in printed school English? Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 304-330.
  19. Nation, I. S. P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and speaking? Canadian Modern Language Review, 63, 59-82.
  20. Nation, I. S. P., & Waring, R. (1997). Vocabulary size, text coverage, and word lists. In N. Schmitt and M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 6-19). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  21. Read, J. (1988). Measuring the vocabulary knowledge of second language learners. RELC Journal, 19(2), 12-25.
  22. Sheldon, L. E. (1988). Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials. ELT Journal, 42, 237-246.
  23. Sinclair, B., & Ellis, G. (1992). Survey: Learning training in EFL course books. ELT Journal, 46, 209-225.
  24. Soars, L., & Soars, J. (2005). New headway student's book (Upper-Intermediate). UK: Oxford University Press.
  25. Tomlinson, B., Dat, B., Masuhara, H., & Rubdy, R. (2001). EFL courses for adults. ELT Journal, 55, 80-101. Reading in a Foreign Language 22(1)
  26. Wesche, M., & Paribakht, T. S. (1996). Assessing second language vocabulary knowledge: Depth versus breadth. Canadian Modern Language Review, 53, 13-40.
  27. Zahar, R., Cobb, T., & Spada, N. (2001). Acquiring vocabulary through reading: Effects of frequency and contextual richness. Canadian Modern Language Review, 57, 541-572.
  28. About the Authors Warren Matsuoka recently commenced his PhD in the Faculty of Education and Social Work, University of Sydney. This paper is based on a dissertation completed as part of his Master of Education (TESOL) studies at the University of Sydney. Warren has previously taught EFL extensively in Japan and Taiwan. His current research interests include vocabulary studies, English language education in Asia, and language use in L2 classrooms. E-mail: wmat7124@uni.sydney.edu.au David Hirsh is a lecturer in TESOL at the University of Sydney. His research focuses on vocabulary studies, language assessment and academic acculturation. Recent publications are Teaching academic writing (University of Michigan Press, 2009, with Paltridge et al.), Researching vocabulary in the edited volume Companion to research methods in applied linguistics (Paltridge & Phakiti, 2010, Continuum) and articles in French Review of Applied Linguistics and Asian EFL Journal (forthcoming). E-mail: david.hirsh@sydney.edu.au

Authors
Matsuoka, W., & Hirsh, D.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Venue
Reading in a Foreign Language
Published
2010-04-01
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
56-70
ISSN
  • 0264-2425 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-0578
OpenAlex
W2140886578
Cited by
113
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Reading in a Foreign Language (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa) (submittedVersion)
  • Reading in a Foreign Language
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
vocabulary acquisition, extensive reading, English as a foreign language, upper-intermediate learners, high-frequency words, academic vocabulary, pre-teaching, vocabulary development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review