CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 102Second Language Acquisition and LearningReading and Literacy DevelopmentEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Unknown vocabulary density and reading comprehension

Open access
Hsueh-chao, Marcella Hu, Nation, Paul·2000·Reading in a Foreign Language
DOI 10.64152/10125/66973
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.64152/10125/66973

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Readings were written so that above 95% of the text was familiar to the reader.

    “A final remark to be made is that all readings were written based on the reading comprehension criterion stating that above 95 % of a text should be familiar to the reader (Hsueh-Chao & Nation, 2000;Schmitt, Jiang, & Grabe, 2011).”

    From Readers, Players, and Watchers: EFL Students’ Vocabulary Acquisition through Digital Video Games (2017) · cites this paper as Hsueh-Chao & Nation, 2000

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hsueh-chao, M. H., & Nation, P.
ORCID
Nation, Paul
Venue
Reading in a Foreign Language
Publisher
National Foreign Language Resource Center
Published
2000-04-01
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
403-430
ISSN
  • 0264-2425 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-0578
DOI
10.64152/10125/66973
OpenAlex
W4414029879
Cited by
102
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Reading in a Foreign Language (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Keywords
lexical density, reading comprehension, foreign language reading, vocabulary knowledge

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review