Cited by 4Information and Cyber SecurityInformation Technology Governance and Strategyfinance, banking, and market dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Cybersecurity Risk Management and Regulatory Compliance Framework for Financial Institutions

Open access

Abstract

Financial institutions remain among the most attractive targets for cyberattacks due to their central role in economic stability, extensive digitalisation, and custody of highly sensitive financial and personal data. The increasing sophistication of cyber threats, combined with stringent regulatory expectations, has created a complex environment in which institutions must simultaneously manage cybersecurity risk and demonstrate compliance with evolving regulatory frameworks. Despite the existence of numerous cybersecurity standards, regulatory guidelines, and risk management models, financial institutions continue to face challenges in aligning technical security controls with governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) requirements in a coherent and auditable manner. Fragmentation between cybersecurity operations and regulatory compliance functions often results in duplicated effort, compliance-driven security implementations, and limited organisational resilience. This paper presents a comprehensive cybersecurity risk management and regulatory compliance framework tailored for financial institutions. The framework integrates established cybersecurity risk management principles with regulatory compliance requirements, providing a structured approach that aligns governance, risk assessment, control implementation, monitoring, and reporting. Drawing on a systematic review of previous literature, international standards, and financial-sector regulatory practices, the framework emphasises proportional risk-based decision-making, continuous monitoring, and accountability across organisational levels. The study synthesises insights from cybersecurity governance, enterprise risk management, financial regulation, and operational resilience literature to bridge the gap between technical security controls and regulatory obligations. The proposed framework contributes to academic and practitioner discourse by offering a unified structure that supports both cybersecurity risk reduction and regulatory assurance. It is particularly relevant for banks, insurance companies, payment service providers, and other regulated financial entities operating in highly digitised and interconnected environments. The paper concludes by highlighting practical implications, implementation challenges, and directions for future empirical validation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.64388/irev8i2-1713553

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bello, A. D., Elebe, O., Hammed, N. I., Omoegun, G. O., & Fadayomi, O.
Venue
Iconic Research and Engineering Journals
Published
2024-08-31
Volume
8
Issue
2
ISSN
2456-8880 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7123349730
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3
FWCI
1.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Iconic Research and Engineering Journals (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › finance, banking, and market dynamics
Keywords
cyber risk management, regulatory compliance, financial institutions, governance, risk, and compliance, risk-based decision making, continuous monitoring, operational resilience, enterprise risk management, financial regulation, security countermeasures, compliance assurance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review