Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 132Asian Industrial and Economic DevelopmentInternational Relations and Foreign PolicyInternational Development and Aid

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Japan, the World Bank, and the Art of Paradigm Maintenance: The East Asian Miracle in Political Perspective

Wade, Robert·1996·New Left Review

Abstract

To what extent is the World Bank an actor, an ‘autonomous variable’ in the international system? Or to what extent are its objectives and approaches the mere manifestations of competition and compromise among its member states? Several writers have argued that the Bank has a relatively large amount . . .

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.64590/84t

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Wade, R.
Corresponding author
Wade, Robert
Venue
New Left Review
Published
1996-05-31
Volume
1
Issue
217
Pages
3-36
ISSN
  • 0028-6060 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-0480
OpenAlex
W4414174347
Cited by
132
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 8
FWCI
4.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
New Left Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Asian Industrial and Economic Development
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
  • Social Sciences › Development › International Development and Aid
Keywords
World Bank, Asian economic miracle, Japan, development policy, international organizations, development aid, political economy of development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.