Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 6World Systems and Global TransformationsPolitical Economy and MarxismAfrican history and culture studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The African Crisis

Arrighi, Giovanni·2002·New Left Review

Abstract

What triggered the descent into misery of so many Sub-Saharan societies in the past twenty years? The regional roots of Africa’s disorders, and the structural transformations in the world system led by the USA that have overshadowed them.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.64590/htc

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Arrighi, G.
Corresponding author
Arrighi, Giovanni
Venue
New Left Review
Published
2002-05-31
Volume
2
Issue
15
Pages
5-36
ISSN
  • 0028-6060 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-0480
OpenAlex
W4414174207
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
New Left Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › World Systems and Global Transformations
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Economy and Marxism
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › African history and culture studies
Keywords
African crisis, sub-Saharan Africa, regional instability, structural change, world-system, US foreign policy, global capitalism, political economy of Africa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.