The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Rethinking Recognition
Abstract
Has the liberating charge of struggles for recognition dissolved into pure identity politics? Do these have to sidestep inequalities of wealth and power? Not, Nancy Fraser contends, if recognition is understood as a question of social status rather than existential address.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recognition is a solution to cultural inequalities; it involves recognising misrecognised identities and changing cultural value systems to enable all individuals to participate in social interaction on equal grounds.
“Recognition is seen as a solution to cultural inequalities and she stresses the importance of recognising misrecognised identities and changing cultural value systems to enable all individuals to participate in social interaction on equal grounds (Fraser, 2000, 2007).”
From ‘I don’t want to go back into the closet just because I need care’: recognition of older LGBTQ adults in relation to future care needs (2020) · cites this paper as Fraser, 2000
Fraser argues there is a risk of emphasising minority cultures as a counterweight to the dominant culture, which puts pressure on members to adapt to a group culture identity, consolidating stereotypes and increasing risk of misrecognition.
“According to Fraser, there is a risk of emphasising minority cultures as a counterweight to the dominant culture, which puts pressure on members to adapt to a group culture identity. This can lead to consolidating stereotypes for minority group identities and result in an increased risk of misrecognition (Fraser, 2000).”
From ‘I don’t want to go back into the closet just because I need care’: recognition of older LGBTQ adults in relation to future care needs (2020) · cites this paper as Fraser, 2000
Fraser argues that equal participation is the basis for understanding issues concerning justice, and creating participatory parity is the most crucial element.
“Fraser argues that equal participation is the basis for understanding issues concerning justice, and creating participatory parity is the most crucial element for her (Fraser, 2000).”
From ‘I don’t want to go back into the closet just because I need care’: recognition of older LGBTQ adults in relation to future care needs (2020) · cites this paper as Fraser, 2000
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What ChatGPT Tells Us about Gender: A Cautionary Tale about Performativity and Gender Biases in AI
Gross, N. (2023) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci12080435 · Cited by 162
Improving student wellbeing: having a say at school
Anderson, D. L., & Graham, A. P. (2016) · School Effectiveness and School Improvement · doi:10.1080/09243453.2015.1084336 · Cited by 142
Towards an agroecology of knowledges: Recognition, cognitive justice and farmers’ autonomy in France
Coolsaet, B. (2016) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.07.012 · Cited by 133
Löf, J., & Olaison, A. (2020) · European Journal of Social Work · doi:10.1080/13691457.2018.1534087 · Cited by 41
Recognizing Settler Ignorance in the Canadian Truth and Reconciliation Commission
Cook, A. (2018) · Feminist Philosophy Quarterly · doi:10.5206/fpq/2018.4.6229 · Cited by 32
Garcia, L. (2018) · Carleton University Dissertation · doi:10.22215/etd/2015-11064
Metadata
- Authors
- Fraser, N.
- Corresponding author
- Fraser, Nancy
- Venue
- New Left Review
- Publisher
- New Left Review
- Published
- 2000-05-31
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 107-120
- ISSN
- 0028-6060 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-0480
- DOI
- 10.64590/pup
- OpenAlex
- W4414159290
- Cited by
- 1,298
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 242 · 2025: 127 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 116 · 2022: 81 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 96 · 2019: 103 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 22
- FWCI
- 29.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- New Left Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Theory and Philosophy
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminist Theory and Gender Studies
- Keywords
- recognition, identity politics, struggle for recognition, social status, wealth and power, inequality, Nancy Fraser
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review