The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Understanding others’ feelings: what is empathy and why do we need it?
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evaluation and Enhancement of Existing Intervention Programs for Juvenile Delinquency
Student Researchers, P. C., Gonzales, I. T., Gonzales, R. U., Student Researchers, P. C., Capoy, P. S., Student Researchers, P. C., Osop, A. D., Student Researchers, P. C., Bustamante-Paster, D. A., & Cabuyao, A. P. (2023) · International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis · doi:10.47191/ijmra/v6-i1-46 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Molenberghs, P.
- Affiliations
- Monash University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Molenberghs, Pascal
- ORCID
- Molenberghs, Pascal
- Publisher
- The Conversation Media Group Ltd
- Published
- 2017-01-08
- OpenAlex
- W4413719310
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-sa
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Philosophies and Pedagogies
- Keywords
- empathy, understanding others' feelings, social cognition, emotional understanding
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review