The DOI matches its Crossref record.
‘Transparency reports’ from tech giants are vague on how they’re combating misinformation. It’s time for legislation
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Testing, implementing, and adopting solutions will therefore likely require regulation (Gal, 2022).”
From Social Drivers and Algorithmic Mechanisms on Digital Media. (2024) · cites this paper as Gal, 2022
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Social Drivers and Algorithmic Mechanisms on Digital Media.
Metzler, H., & Garcia, D. (2024) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916231185057 · Cited by 204
Metadata
- Authors
- Gal, U.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Gal, Uri
- ORCID
- Gal, Uri
- Publisher
- The Conversation Media Group Ltd
- Published
- 2022-06-10
- OpenAlex
- W4413588005
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Law › Freedom of Expression and Defamation
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Keywords
- transparency reports, Big Tech, misinformation, content moderation, digital platforms, legislation, platform accountability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ‘Transparency reports’ from tech giants are vague on how they’re combating misinformation. It’s time for legislation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.64628/aa.uk5yg4kke
- The paper
- Gal, U. (2022). ‘Transparency reports’ from tech giants are vague on how they’re combating misinformation. It’s time for legislation. https://doi.org/10.64628/aa.uk5yg4kke