CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1Artificial Intelligence in EducationArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationEthics and Social Impacts of AI

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.

‘Please do not assume the worst of us’: students know AI is here to stay and want unis to teach them how to use it

Liu, Danny, Bridgeman, Adam, Chan, Cecilia·2023
DOI 10.64628/aa.w9wdfgkyu
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.64628/aa.w9wdfgkyu

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Liu, D., Bridgeman, A., & Chan, C.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • University of Hong Kong
ORCID
Publisher
The Conversation Media Group Ltd
Published
2023-05-15
DOI
10.64628/aa.w9wdfgkyu
OpenAlex
W4413521702
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Keywords
artificial intelligence in higher education, student attitudes, AI literacy, AI skills training, university students, generative AI

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review