The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The latest medical assistance in dying decision needs to be appealed: Here’s why
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The federal government did not appeal the Truchon ruling despite having compelling reasons to do so.
“Unusually, the federal government did not appeal the ruling despite having compelling reasons to do so (Lemmens and Jacobs 2019).”
From The realities of Medical Assistance in Dying in Canada (2023) · cites this paper as Lemmens and Jacobs 2019
The Carter case did not deal with mental illness, and the Supreme Court explicitly stated it was not ruling on MAiD for mental illness.
“Despite the fact that the case did not deal with mental illness, and that the Supreme Court explicitly stated in the Carter case (Supreme Court of Canada 2015) that it was not ruling on MAiD for mental illness (Lemmens et al. 2023; Lemmens et al. 2019), the law nevertheless included mental illnesses as forthcoming qualifying diagnoses.”
From The realities of Medical Assistance in Dying in Canada (2023) · cites this paper as Lemmens et al. 2019
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The realities of Medical Assistance in Dying in Canada
Coelho, R., Maher, J., Gaind, K. S., & Lemmens, T. (2023) · Palliative and Supportive Care · doi:10.1017/s1478951523001025 · Cited by 70
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lemmens, T., & Jacobs, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- University of Windsor (CA)
- Publisher
- The Conversation Media Group Ltd
- Published
- 2019-10-09
- OpenAlex
- W4413630957
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
- Keywords
- medical assistance in dying, assisted dying, appeal, euthanasia, end-of-life decisions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
