PreprintCited by 1Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsGenomics and Rare DiseasesHereditary Neurological Disorders

A Functional Genetic Atlas of Parkin Resolves Variants of Uncertain Significance and Predicts Parkinson’s Disease Age at Onset

Open access
Aslanzadeh, Vahid, Glendinning, Sophie, Sari, Yustika, Clarke, Marguerite, Rodger, Christine J., Lin, Xiaoyi, Lenka, Dipti Ranjan, Richardson, Lucy +10 more·2026·bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Abstract

Autosomal recessive mutations in the Parkin gene ( PRKN ) cause early-onset Parkinson’s disease (PD). Parkin functions as a ubiquitin E3 ligase acting downstream of the PINK1 kinase to promote phosphorylated ubiquitin at sites of mitochondrial damage. Yet the functional effects of most PRKN gene variants remain unknown. Here we use a pooled cellular assay measuring phosphorylated ubiquitin accumulation to quantify the activity of ∼9,200 PRKN missense and nonsense variants. Our screen identifies thousands of loss- and gain-of-function variants, including activating variants mainly residing at autoinhibitory interfaces. Functional scores accurately distinguish known PD pathogenic and benign variants, and enable reclassification of 173/184 variants of uncertain significance (VUS). When combined into biallelic genotype scores, these data predict the age at disease onset in patients, revealing a quantitative link between Parkin activity and clinical manifestation. Our results provide a comprehensive functional genetic map of Parkin and demonstrate the power of multiplexed assays of variant effects (MAVEs) for variant interpretation and precision medicine in PD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.64898/2026.02.09.704817

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two independent MAVEs of Parkin using different cellular systems and assay designs showed strong agreement (R = 0.77) and high diagnostic performance (ROC AUC 0.92 and 0.94), despite differences in library design, functional readout, and model system.

    “Two independent MAVEs of Parkin using different cellular systems and assay designs showed strong agreement (R = 0.77) and high diagnostic performance (ROC AUC 0.92 and 0.94), despite differences in library design, functional readout, and model system (101, 102).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aslanzadeh, V., Glendinning, S., Sari, Y., Clarke, M., Rodger, C. J., Lin, X., Lenka, D. R., Richardson, L., Liang, J. R., Kleinz, T., Sproul, D., Lohmann, K., Klein, C., Sammler, E. M., Alessi, D. R., Kumar, A., Muqit, M. M. K., & Kudla, G.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Genetics and Cancer (GB)
  • University of Dundee (GB)
  • Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal (IN)
  • University of Lübeck (DE)
Corresponding author
Kudla, Grzegorz
Venue
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2026-02-09
OpenAlex
W7128535708
Cited by
1
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Hereditary Neurological Disorders
Keywords
Parkin, Parkinson's disease, variants of uncertain significance, variant reclassification, E3 ubiquitin ligase, PINK1, mitochondrial damage, genotype score, MAVE, precision medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review