PreprintCited by 0Wound Healing and TreatmentsAdvanced Chemical Sensor TechnologiesAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials

Healing cascades and infections in wounds monitored using a wearable sensor of gaseous flux

Open access
Cho, Seunghee, Tan, Ansen, Chen, Zixi, Pyun, Kyung Rok, Li, Shupeng, Yin, Fujie, Zhang, Aiwa, Feldman, Neena +9 more·2026·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Capabilities for quantitative monitoring of chronic wounds remain an unmet clinical need, as existing diagnostic approaches rely on semiquantitative evaluation of symptoms that lack sensitivity especially during early stages of infection. Here we present a scheme for tracking wound physiology that leverages a miniature, wireless skin-interfaced device for non-contact, transient measurements of the flux of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and water vapor from the wound microenvironment. Unlike emerging smart bandage platforms that rely on physical contact with the fragile wound bed to interrogate liquid-phase biomarkers, this strategy uses an engineered microclimate and suspended suite of sensors to measure the diffusive transport of wound-derived gases across the wound surface but separated from it. The result enables quantitative evaluation of metabolic activity and healing progression without perturbing the healing tissues. In biofilm growth models of Staphylococcus aureus , measurements demonstrate that trends in VOC flux correlate strongly with bacterial growth kinetics and precede any visible biofilm formation. Longitudinal monitoring in infected murine wound healing models shows that concurrent measurements of water vapor and VOC flux provide complementary physiological insights, capturing both the trajectory of barrier restoration and the dynamics of bacterial burden. The findings establish this non-contact sensing scheme as a distinct and clinically translatable paradigm for wound monitoring, with broad implications for non-invasive surveillance of disease states in which tissue metabolic activity and skin barrier integrity serve as actionable physiological readouts. Significance Statement: Limited capabilities in continuous, quantitative assessment of a wound make early diagnosis and effective management challenging, particularly in cases of infection that rapidly progress before symptoms appear. Non-contact approaches for wound monitoring that preserve fragile tissue can transform wound care. In this context, gaseous flux from the wound bed provides an integrative measure of microbial activity and barrier restoration. This study establishes a wearable sensing platform that quantifies these fluxes in real time, enabling early infection detection and temporal tracking of wound healing. These results highlight a path toward personalized treatment strategies and reduced reliance on episodic clinical evaluation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.64898/2026.06.18.733171

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Cho, S., Tan, A., Chen, Z., Pyun, K. R., Li, S., Yin, F., Zhang, A., Feldman, N., Neuhart, E. J., Moreno, A. D., Yoon, J. E., Shin, J., Song, J. W., Trueb, J., Huang, Y., Ameer, G. A., & Rogers, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Querrey-Simpson Institute for Bioelectronics, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Korean Association Of Science and Technology Studies (KR)
Corresponding author
  • Tan, Ansen
  • Chen, Zixi
  • Pyun, Kyung Rok
  • Huang, Yonggang
  • Ameer, Guillermo A.
  • Rogers, John A.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2026-06-22
Volume
123
Issue
40
Pages
e2613824123-e2613824123
ISSN
0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7214764682
Cited by
0
References
1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK131302)
  • CZ Biohub Spoke Project (Agreement 2/4/2025)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (T32EB031527)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
Keywords
wound infection, volatile organic compounds, wearable sensors, non-contact sensing, water vapor flux, Staphylococcus aureus biofilm, bacterial growth kinetics, diabetic wounds, skin barrier integrity, wound healing, wound microenvironment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review