PreprintCited by 0CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringVirus-based gene therapy researchProtein Degradation and Inhibitors

Universal donor plasmids for biallelic degron-tagging in mammalian cells and organoids

Open access
Pohl, Sebastian Öther-Gee, Morán, Brianda A Hernández, Cardozo, Camila Guzman, Taylor, Gillian CA, Giller, Abram, Myant, Kevin B, Macias, Sara, Wood, Andrew J·2026·bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Abstract

Degron tags enable rapid, tuneable and reversible control of protein expression, and have become a critical tool for target validation and elucidating biological mechanisms. Tag engineering uses genome editing to generate biallelic gene fusions, though this process remains laborious and requires new donor vectors to be generated for each locus. Here, we have generated a series of universal donor vectors to enable biallelic integration of different degron tags (AID, dTAG, BromoTag, SMASh) using different selection strategies (FACS, drug selection). Using this system, tags can be fused in-frame to endogenous protein C-termini via homology-independent repair following Cas9-induced double strand breaks, as shown here using human lymphoma cells, mouse embryonic stem cells and colonic tumour organoids. This workflow simplifies the genetic engineering of degron tags and is applicable in contexts where homology-dependent repair is challenging.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.64898/2026.09.14.751494

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Authors
Pohl, S. Ö.-G., Morán, B. A. H., Cardozo, C. G., Taylor, G. C., Giller, A., Myant, K. B., Macias, S., & Wood, A. J.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Genetics and Cancer (GB)
  • Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
  • Institute of Immunology and Infection Research, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
Corresponding author
Wood, Andrew J
Venue
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2026-09-17
OpenAlex
W7213459208
Cited by
0
References
0
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (221737, 221737/Z/20/Z)
  • Medical Research Council (MC_PC_21040)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
Keywords
CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing, protein degradation, AID, DTAG, smash, organoids, drug selection, target validation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review