PreprintCited by 0Mental Health Treatment and AccessDigital Mental Health InterventionsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

A lay teacher-counsellor delivered brief psychological treatment for moderate to severe depression among older adolescents in senior high schools in Ghana (Y-MIND): a feasibility cluster randomized controlled trial

Open access
Weobong, Benedict, Hodsoll, John, Akanlu, Anthony Gerald, Adde, Kenneth Setorwu, Attah, Dzifa A., Adagnera, Judith, Awine, Timothy, Bawa, Simon +22 more·2026·medRxiv

Abstract

Introduction: Adolescents experience high rates of depression and anxiety, yet globally 80% of adolescents and almost all in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) lack access to adolescent-friendly treatments. The African Youth in Mind (Y-MIND) set out to adapt the youth version of the Friendship Bench and assess its feasibility for delivery in Ghana. Methods: In this feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial, we recruited participants aged 15–18 years with probable diagnosis of moderate to severe depression ascertained with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) total score > 9 from six Senior High Schools in Navrongo, Ghana. Schools were randomly allocated (1:2) to enhanced usual care (EUC) alone or EUC combined with Y-MIND, prior to recruitment of participants. Primary outcomes were feasibility (intervention delivery; conducting a fully powered trial). Secondary outcomes were intervention appropriateness, acceptability, and probable depression symptom severity and remission on the PHQ-9. Results: Between July and August 2024, we enrolled and allocated 67 participants (43 [64%] to the EUC plus Y-MIND group and 24 [36%] to the EUC alone group), of whom 64 (95.5%) completed the 5-month primary outcome assessment (41 [95.3%] in the EUC plus Y-MIND group and 23 [95.8%] in the EUC alone group). The feasibility of delivering the Y-MIND intervention from the perspective of adolescents had a mean score of 4.3 (0.5). Therapy quality score was 94.8% (95% CI: 93.0–96.6), while therapy competence was 86.6% (95% CI: 81.2–92.2). We observed initial clinical benefits, including lower severity of depressive symptoms among adolescents in the Y-MIND group as compared to those in the EUC group, with most participants achieving symptomatic remission at the month 5 follow-up. Conclusion: The Y-MIND school-based psychological treatment model demonstrated good acceptability and feasibility, with high recruitment, retention, treatment adherence, and provider competence. While preliminary findings indicate potential improvements in depressive symptoms, the study was not designed to establish effectiveness. These findings justify progression to a fully powered trial to determine clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and the scalability of the intervention within routine school settings in LMICs. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT06740084 ).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.64898/2026.10.08.26364988

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Weobong, B., Hodsoll, J., Akanlu, A. G., Adde, K. S., Attah, D. A., Adagnera, J., Awine, T., Bawa, S., Jopling, R., Owusu, B. A., Bere, T., Owusu, L., Anyorikeya, M., Nyamayaro, P., Adams, S., Achana, F., Dambayi, E., Ayuure, C., Heller, D. J., Yaro, P. B., Adongo, P. B., Glozah, F. N., Aborigo, R., Barrett, B., Smith, P., Kumwenda, M., Chibanda, D., Abas, M., Goldsmith, K., & *Y-MIND consortium
Affiliations
  • University of Ghana (GH)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Navrongo Health Research Centre (GH)
  • University of Zimbabwe (ZW)
  • Ghana Health Service (GH)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (MW)
  • King’s College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK
Corresponding author
Weobong, Benedict
Venue
medRxiv
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2026-10-11
OpenAlex
W7221467928
Cited by
0
References
5
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR133384)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
adolescent depression, Friendship Bench, adolescents, depression severity, remission, intervention feasibility, acceptability, provider competence, medication adherence, Ghana, low- and middle-income countries, adolescent mental health services, school mental health, PHQ-9, intervention fidelity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review