Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge
Abstract
In this groundbreaking new book, one of the world's greatest living scientists argues for the fundamental unity of all knowledge and the need to search for what he calls consilience, the composition of the principles governing every branch of learning. Edward O Wilson, the pioneer of sociobiology and biodiversity, once again breaks out of the conventions of current thinking. He shows how our explosive rise in intellectual mastery of the truths of our universe has its roots in the ancient Greek concept of an intrinsic orderliness that governs our cosmos. It is a vision that found its apogee in the Age of Enlightenment, then gradually was lost in the increasing fragmentation and specialisation of knowledge in the last two centuries. Professor Wilson shows why the goals of the original Enlightenment are surging back to life, why they are reappearing on the very frontiers of science and human scholarship, and how they are beginning to sketch themselves as the blueprint of our world.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Astrobiology is well-placed to help heal the rift between science and the humanities.
“astrobiology is well-placed to (again, at least partially) help heal the rift between science and the humanities”
From Widening perspectives: the intellectual and social benefits of astrobiology (regardless of whether extraterrestrial life is discovered or not) (2018) · cites this paper as Wilson (1998)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Guidelines and Examples
Torraco, R. J. (2005) · Human Resource Development Review · doi:10.1177/1534484305278283 · Cited by 3,534 · see citing works
Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Using the Past and Present to Explore the Future
Torraco, R. J. (2016) · Human Resource Development Review · doi:10.1177/1534484316671606 · Cited by 1,345 · see citing works
Malleability, plasticity, and individuality: How children learn and develop in context<sup>1</sup>
Cantor, P., Osher, D., Berg, J., Steyer, L., & Rose, T. (2019) · Applied Developmental Science · doi:10.1080/10888691.2017.1398649 · Cited by 328 · see citing works
The Mind and its Stories: Narrative Universals and Human Emotion
Hogan, P. C. (2003) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511499951 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Crawford, I. A. (2018) · International Journal of Astrobiology · doi:10.1017/s1473550417000088 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wilson, E. O.
- Corresponding author
- Wilson, Edward O.
- Venue
- ETC: A Review of General Semantics
- Publisher
- Institute of General Semantics
- Published
- 1998
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 359-360
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 0014-164X
- 2168-9245
- OpenAlex
- W1576372720
- Cited by
- 2,682
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 105 · 2019: 74 · 2018: 75 · 2017: 102 · 2016: 98 · 2015: 105 · 2014: 123 · 2013: 132 · 2012: 138
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Choice Reviews Online (publishedVersion)
- ETC.: A Review of General Semantics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Scientific and Historical Analyses
- Keywords
- unity of knowledge, knowledge fragmentation, specialization, Enlightenment, ancient Greek philosophy, interdisciplinary research, Edward O. Wilson, sociobiology, biodiversity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review