The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Developing a conceptual framework for identifying the ethical repercussions of artificial intelligence: A mixed method analysis
Abstract
Given that the topic of artificial intelligence (AI) ethics is novel, and many studies are emerging to uncover AI’s ethical challenges, the current study aims to analyse and visualise the research patterns and influential elements in this field. This paper analyses 1,646 Scopus-indexed publications using bibliometric analysis and cluster content analysis. To classify the most prominent elements and delineate the intellectual framework as well as the emerging patterns and gaps, we utilised keyword co-occurrence analysis and bibliographic coupling analysis and network visualisation of authors, countries, sources, documents and institutions. In particular, we detected nine major applications of AI in which ethics of AI is highly discussed, 24 ethical categories and 66 ethical concerns. Using the VOSviewer software, we also identified the general ethical concerns with the greatest total link strength regardless of their cluster associations. Then, focusing on the most recent articles (2020–21), we performed a cluster content analysis of the identified topic clusters and ethical concerns. This analysis guided us in detecting literature gaps and prospective topics and in developing a conceptual framework to illustrate a comprehensive image of ethical AI research trends. This study will assist policymakers, regulators, developers, engineers and researchers in better understanding AI’s ethical challenges and identifying the most pressing concerns that need to be tackled.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Audiences were segmented only coarsely (by broad demographics or media channels), and campaigns unfolded on fixed schedules (Saheb et al., 2022;Sedkaoui & Benaichouba, 2024;Thirumagal et al., 2024;Yadav, S. J., 2024).”
From Surveillance Capitalism, Consumer Subjectivity and Marketing in the Age of Artificial Intelligence (2025) · cites this paper as Saheb et al., 2022
In the citing paper
“Mass marketing, which dominated the last century, operated on broadcast principles: a single message (a TV commercial, print ad, or billboard) was disseminated to millions, with minimal personalization.”
From Surveillance Capitalism, Consumer Subjectivity and Marketing in the Age of Artificial Intelligence (2025) · cites this paper as Saheb et al., 2022
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Surveillance Capitalism, Consumer Subjectivity and Marketing in the Age of Artificial Intelligence
Marchand, É., Durand, T., & Dubois, M. (2025) · Social Science Chronicle · doi:10.56106/ssc.2025.001 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Saheb, T., Jamthe, S., & Saheb, T.
- Affiliations
- Tarbiat Modares University (IR)
- Technology Futurist
- ORCID
- Saheb, Tahereh
- Venue
- Journal of AI, Robotics & Workplace Automation
- Publisher
- Henry Stewart Publications
- Published
- 2022-06-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 371
- ISSN
- 2633-562X (ISSN-L)
- 2633-5638
- OpenAlex
- W4400997436
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 2.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of AI, robotics & workplace automation. (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
- Keywords
- AI ethics, conceptual framework, research trends, artificial intelligence applications, ethical categories, research gaps, AI regulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Developing a conceptual framework for identifying the ethical repercussions of artificial intelligence: A mixed method analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.69554/ffzo4203
- The paper
- Saheb, T., Jamthe, S., & Saheb, T. (2022). Developing a conceptual framework for identifying the ethical repercussions of artificial intelligence: A mixed method analysis. Journal of AI, Robotics & Workplace Automation. https://doi.org/10.69554/ffzo4203