The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Beyond Compliance: Reframing Accessibility as Pedagogical Practice
Open accessAbstract
This editorial argues that accessibility in higher education must move beyond compliance toward a culture of inclusive pedagogy. Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requires public institutions like SUNY to ensure equitable access for individuals with disabilities. Yet, compliance is too often treated as a technical or legal obligation rather than an integral part of teaching and learning. Faculty - those most responsible for enacting accessibility - frequently face barriers such as limited time, training, and institutional support. Without systemic investment, accessibility risks becoming a burdensome checklist rather than a transformative practice. The authors call for a reframing of accessibility as foundational to good teaching: emphasizing clarity, flexibility, and inclusive design that benefits all learners. Achieving this vision requires sustained institutional commitment and recognition of accessibility as core academic labor. When approached as a shared pedagogical responsibility, accessibility strengthens learning, equity, and SUNY’s public mission.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
Metadata
- Authors
- McCarron, M., Kruger, J., & Vincent, S.
- Venue
- Innovations in Learning: A SUNY-Focused Teaching Journal
- Publisher
- University at Buffalo (SUNY)
- Published
- 2025-12-12
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 3071-0987 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7139032607
- Semantic Scholar
- 7e6308d14824d78cea1df5dcda0f97f866331008
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Type
- journal article
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Innovations in Learning A SUNY-Focused Teaching Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Disability Education and Employment
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disability Rights and Representation
- Keywords
- accessibility in higher education, inclusive pedagogy, disability equity, inclusive design, State University of New York
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review