Cited by 6Misinformation and Its ImpactsLiteracy, Media, and EducationIslamic Finance and Communication

The Effect of Media Literacy on Misinformation and Deep Fake Video Detection

Open access
Shawky El Mokadem, Sarah·2023·Arab Media & Society

Abstract

Misinformation has become a major problem in virtually all societies. The emergence of deepfake AI technology has only exacerbated issues around misinformation and disinformation. One way to try to limit the negative effects of fake news and false information in a society is media literacy. This study focused on the effect of media literacy on detecting fake news in both video and text messages. Based on Inoculation Theory, three hypotheses were suggested and a quasi-experimental research design was conducted. The participants included 204 highly educated Egyptians who were divided into three groups. One group was given a powerpoint lecture on the meaning of misinformation, its consequences, how to verify information received via social media, and examples of fake news. The second group was given a similar presentation but instead of talking about misinformation in general the presentation focused on deepfake AI technology. The third group was the control and were not given any media literacy information. Two types of fake messages were evaluated by each group; a Facebook post with text and an image and a deepfake video. The results of the study suggest the effectiveness of media literacy lectures in raising the rate of detection of fake news whether in the form of text or video. Results also indicated a decreased probability of sharing the fake messages. The study recommends designing media literacy lectures including both information on misinformation in general and specific information on the new technology creating fake news like deepfake.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.70090/sm23emlm

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Media literacy training improves detection performance.

    “Media literacy training improves detection performance [45]”

    From Human Performance in Deepfake Detection: A Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [45]

  • Participants who underwent media literacy training or deepfake detection training showed better deepfake detection performance compared to a control group.

    “In both studies, participants who underwent the training showed better deepfake detection performance compared to a control group.”

    From Human Performance in Deepfake Detection: A Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [45]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shawky El Mokadem, S.
Venue
Arab Media & Society
Published
2023-08-14
Issue
35
ISSN
1687-7721 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402101233
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4
FWCI
2.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
Arab Media and Society. (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literacy, Media, and Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Islamic Finance and Communication
Keywords
media literacy, misinformation, deepfake videos, fake news detection, inoculation theory, disinformation, fake news sharing, social media, fact-checking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review